Jolley: High Fiving Yvonne Vizzier Thaxton's Commentaries On The AAVMC/HSUS Union
08/21/2009 04:09PM
Bookmark
Subscribe
So some of you thought the credit card scandal created by the business relationship between Bank of America and HSUS was a five alarmer? How about a potential hook up between the AAVMC and HSUS? Can anyone say "beer goggles?"
Earlier this week, Yvonne Vizzier Thaxton, editor of Poultry magazine, blogged about what she saw as an unholy alliance. She was writing about the flirtation going on between the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC).
I was stunned that AAVMC would even consider inviting the fox into the hen house. Maybe it was just a quick Homer Simpson moment contrived by some not-so-heavy thinker at AAVMC and it would quickly pass. Foxes, after all, don't make nice with hens. They eat them for breakfast, lunch and dinner. AND HSUS President & CEO Wayne Pacelle is one of the shrewdest and most media-savvy foxes those poor folks at AAVMC will ever meet.
Thaxton asked that her readers consider the bizarre construct of turning AAVMC and HSUS into (strange) bedfellows. She wrote, "According to a note I received from a faculty member at one of the U.S. Veterinary Colleges, AAVMC invited HSUS to join their board and took a donation for the Education Consortium from them. What does that mean to the future attitude of veterinary inspectors in the poultry industry? (Or the beef industry, for that matter). If this bothers you, consider writing your College of Veterinary Medicine and express your concern."
Of course it only took a few days for her to do a Paul Harvey and come back with The Rest Of The Story. That Fox-worthy HSUS President & CEO, Wayne Pacelle has already bitten the hands of the veterinarians that offered to feed him. Yesterday, he used his blog to attack the American Veterinary Medical Association for its "evil connection to food animal vets and big agriculture".
"The HSUS doesn't shrink from its responsibility to take on industries that cause or defend animal abuse, including trophy hunting groups like the Safari Club or factory farming advocates like the United Egg Producers. But it's startling when we have to call out groups that should stand in the forefront of animal protection but are part of the problem when it comes to the mistreatment of animals.
That is, sadly, the case with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). People rightly look to their individual veterinarians as experts on animal welfare. They take an oath to alleviate animal suffering and in their professional work or in their volunteer efforts, they nobly fulfill that oath on a daily basis. Yet it's been our experience that AVMA policies are out of step with a large share of veterinarians and the organization typically takes unfriendly positions on many of the major animal welfare questions of the day."
To which Thaxton replied "This would seem to indicate that there is no alliance between American veterinarians and HSUS. And, in my experience, these men and women fulfill every aspect of their oath. This attack by Pacelle is just more proof of HSUS's intent which is to do away with all animal agriculture and convert us to vegetarians or vegans."
Or maybe it just points to a schism between 'pet' vets and large animal vets? It seems to be what Pacelle was banking on by sharing a little bit of his considerable bank roll with AAVMC. I wonder what the table stakes were to get into this game?
And here is the game I'm sure he has his eye on: In a few weeks, AVMA and AAVMC will host "Swimming with the Tide - Animal Welfare in Veterinary Medical Education and Research" - An AVMA/AAVMC Joint International Educational Symposium on Animal Welfare. Click here for their proposed agenda.
Thaxton wrote "The AAVMC formed the North American Veterinary Medical Education Consortium in July of last year with "the objective of developing a plan to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of veterinary medical education to meet societal needs." They might have thought HSUS would help them meet those societal needs.
But the only societal need understood by HSUS is the vegetarianism they hope to foist on the majority of Americans those of us who love a great steak and enjoy a little fried chicken from time-to-time.
Bottom Line: It just proves a point: If you're going to extend a hand of friendship to an old enemy who's spent years on the other side of the aisle, make sure he's been defanged, first.
Comments? CRJolley@msn.com