Processing...

Jolley: High Fiving Yvonne Vizzier Thaxton's Commentaries On The AAVMC/HSUS Union

08/21/2009 04:09PM

Average rating:  (0)

Subscribe
Friend's Email *  
Your Email
Subject * 
Message
Verify
If the number is difficult to decipher try selecting Refresh
 
So some of you thought the credit card scandal created by the business relationship between Bank of America and HSUS was a five alarmer? How about a potential hook up between the AAVMC and HSUS? Can anyone say "beer goggles?"

Earlier this week, Yvonne Vizzier Thaxton, editor of Poultry magazine, blogged about what she saw as an unholy alliance. She was writing about the flirtation going on between the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC).

I was stunned that AAVMC would even consider inviting the fox into the hen house. Maybe it was just a quick Homer Simpson moment contrived by some not-so-heavy thinker at AAVMC and it would quickly pass. Foxes, after all, don't make nice with hens. They eat them for breakfast, lunch and dinner. AND HSUS President & CEO Wayne Pacelle is one of the shrewdest and most media-savvy foxes those poor folks at AAVMC will ever meet.

Thaxton asked that her readers consider the bizarre construct of turning AAVMC and HSUS into (strange) bedfellows. She wrote, "According to a note I received from a faculty member at one of the U.S. Veterinary Colleges, AAVMC invited HSUS to join their board and took a donation for the Education Consortium from them. What does that mean to the future attitude of veterinary inspectors in the poultry industry? (Or the beef industry, for that matter). If this bothers you, consider writing your College of Veterinary Medicine and express your concern."

Of course it only took a few days for her to do a Paul Harvey and come back with The Rest Of The Story. That Fox-worthy HSUS President & CEO, Wayne Pacelle has already bitten the hands of the veterinarians that offered to feed him. Yesterday, he used his blog to attack the American Veterinary Medical Association for its "evil connection to food animal vets and big agriculture".

"The HSUS doesn't shrink from its responsibility to take on industries that cause or defend animal abuse, including trophy hunting groups like the Safari Club or factory farming advocates like the United Egg Producers. But it's startling when we have to call out groups that should stand in the forefront of animal protection but are part of the problem when it comes to the mistreatment of animals.

That is, sadly, the case with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). People rightly look to their individual veterinarians as experts on animal welfare. They take an oath to alleviate animal suffering and in their professional work or in their volunteer efforts, they nobly fulfill that oath on a daily basis. Yet it's been our experience that AVMA policies are out of step with a large share of veterinarians and the organization typically takes unfriendly positions on many of the major animal welfare questions of the day."

To which Thaxton replied "This would seem to indicate that there is no alliance between American veterinarians and HSUS. And, in my experience, these men and women fulfill every aspect of their oath. This attack by Pacelle is just more proof of HSUS's intent which is to do away with all animal agriculture and convert us to vegetarians or vegans."

Or maybe it just points to a schism between 'pet' vets and large animal vets? It seems to be what Pacelle was banking on by sharing a little bit of his considerable bank roll with AAVMC. I wonder what the table stakes were to get into this game?

And here is the game I'm sure he has his eye on: In a few weeks, AVMA and AAVMC will host "Swimming with the Tide - Animal Welfare in Veterinary Medical Education and Research" - An AVMA/AAVMC Joint International Educational Symposium on Animal Welfare. Click here for their proposed agenda.

Thaxton wrote "The AAVMC formed the North American Veterinary Medical Education Consortium in July of last year with "the objective of developing a plan to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of veterinary medical education to meet societal needs." They might have thought HSUS would help them meet those societal needs.

But the only societal need understood by HSUS is the vegetarianism they hope to foist on the majority of Americans – those of us who love a great steak and enjoy a little fried chicken from time-to-time.

Bottom Line: It just proves a point: If you're going to extend a hand of friendship to an old enemy who's spent years on the other side of the aisle, make sure he's been defanged, first.

Comments? CRJolley@msn.com
3 Comments
welfare not rightsUnited StatesAugust 26, 2009 01:54
Read: "Inhumane Wayne"
http://onenationunderdog.blogspot.com/2007/05/hu-inhumane-wayne.html

and: Humane Society of the United States? What’s so Humane about this?
http://onenationunderdog.blogspot.com/2007/05/hu-we-have-no-etical-obligation.html
JanCNCAugust 24, 2009 01:49
Interesting that dangerous breed laws has killed more large breed dogs this year, many being shot on sight and not all were considered dangerous breeds. Oops! There were a few Labs lost in the dog hunt. Seems cruel to me. More dogs have undergone spay and neuter by law, but it is cruel to hush a dog's bark so they can remain with their owner. Dogs do bark and some breeds more than others. Convenient that laws came forth regarding cruel surgery to hush the bark and then comes the laws for a barking dog is a neusience and punishable by death....yes, cruel.

One can only ask has animal rights gone way, way toooooo far?

We have yet to talk about how asset forefeiture is being used. Hang on to those Angus and your Rhode Island Reds - they are in line eventually.
JC
Dr. RossetCaliforniaAugust 22, 2009 11:45
Despite the words “humane society” on its letterhead, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is not affiliated with your local animal shelter. Despite the omnipresent dogs and cats in its fundraising materials, it’s not an organization that runs spay/neuter programs or takes in stray, neglected, and abused pets. And despite the common image of animal protection agencies as cash-strapped organizations dedicated to animal welfare, HSUS has become the wealthiest animal rights organization on earth.
HSUS is big, rich, and powerful, a “humane society” in name only. And while most local animal shelters are under-funded and unsung, HSUS has accumulated $113 million in assets and built a recognizable brand by capitalizing on the confusion its very name provokes. This misdirection results in an irony of which most animal lovers are unaware: HSUS raises enough money to finance animal shelters in every single state, with money to spare, yet it doesn’t operate a single one anywhere.
Instead, HSUS spends millions on programs that seek to economically cripple meat and dairy producers; eliminate the use of animals in biomedical research labs; phase out pet breeding, zoos, and circus animal acts; and demonize hunters as crazed lunatics. HSUS spends $2 million each year on travel expenses alone, just keeping its multi-national agenda going.
HSUS president Wayne Pacelle described some of his goals in 2004 for The Washington Post: “We will see the end of wild animals in circus acts … [and we’re] phasing out animals used in research. Hunting? I think you will see a steady decline in numbers.” More recently, in a June 2005 interview, Pacelle told Satya magazine that HSUS is working on “a guide to vegetarian eating, to really make the case for it.” A strict vegan himself, Pacelle added: “Reducing meat consumption can be a tremendous benefit to animals.”
Shortly after Pacelle joined HSUS in 1994, he told Animal People (an inside-the-movement watchdog newspaper) that his goal was to build “a National Rifle Association of the animal rights movement.” And now, as the organization’s leader, he’s in a position to back up his rhetoric with action. In 2005 Pacelle announced the formation of a new “Animal Protection Litigation Section” within HSUS, dedicated to “the process of researching, preparing, and prosecuting animal protection lawsuits in state and federal court.”
HSUS’s current goals have little to do with animal shelters. The group has taken aim at the traditional morning meal of bacon and eggs with a tasteless “Breakfast of Cruelty” campaign. Its newspaper op-eds demand that consumers “help make this a more humane world [by] reducing our consumption of meat and egg products.” Since its inception, HSUS has tried to limit the choices of American consumers, opposing dog breeding, conventional livestock and poultry farming, rodeos, circuses, horse racing, and marine aquariums. There is an enormous difference between animal “welfare” organizations, which work for the humane treatment of animals, and animal “rights” organizations, which aim to completely end the use and ownership of animals. The former have been around for centuries; the latter emerged in the 1980s, with the rise of the radical People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). It takes tens of millions of dollars to run campaigns against so many domestic targets, and HSUS consistently misleads Americans with its fundraising efforts by hinting that it’s a “humane society” in the more conventional sense of the term. Buried deep within HSUS’s website is a disclaimer noting that the group “is not affiliated with, nor is it a parent organization for, local humane societies, animal shelters, or animal care and control agencies. These are independent organizations … HSUS does not operate or have direct control over any animal shelter.”
What they really want is an end to following professions, veternary medicine, livestock ranching, rodeos, dog shows, eating meat, butcher shops, grocery stores that sell meat, hunting, dairy farming, animal companionship, guide dogs, theraphy dogs, search and rescue dogs, police dogs, army dogs, any and all relationships with animals, also the end of zoos and all animal conservation programs.
EDUCATION CENTER

Revalor ®

Alpharma

IVOMEC

Scour Bos ®