USDA diet quality report lacks important nutrition details

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

While the USDA Economic Research Service’s report on diet quality among working age adults between 2005 and 2010 shows consumers are getting fewer calories from fat and saturated fat, consuming less cholesterol and eating more fiber, it provides no detail about dietary patterns related to specific food groups – be it fruits and vegetables, protein, dairy or grains.

The report, Changes in Eating Patterns and Diet Quality Among Working-Age Adults, 2005-2010, used data from three rounds of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey – before, during and after the recession. It compared caloric intake, calories from food away from home (FAFH) and fast food, total number of meals and snacks consumed in a day, total number of meals and snacks from FAFH were compared. The four measures of diet quality used in the study were percent of calories front fat and from saturated fat, total cholesterol intake and total fiber intake.

According to the report:

  • On average, daily caloric intake declined by 188 calories (about 5 percent) between 2005 and 2010 among working age adults.
  • Calories consumed through FAFH dropped by 127 calories per day and the average person ate three fewer meals and 1.5 fewer snacks per month away from home.
  • The share of calories from fat declined 1.12 percentage points and from saturated fat declined by 0.67 percentage points.
  • Intake of cholesterol declined by 24 milligrams per day and fiber intake increased by 1.2 grams per day.
  • 42 percent of working age adults and 57 percent of older adults reported using the Nutrition Facts Panel to make food decisions.
  • Reduced consumption of FAFH accounted for less than 20 percent of the improvements in diet quality.
  • In 2010 compared with 2007, working age adults were less likely to answer than thinness or fatness is something with which people are born, suggesting that more individuals recognize weight is within individual control.

A news release from USDA touted efforts of the Obama administration, such as USDA’s MyPlate symbol to help Americans follow the 2010 dietary guidelines, USDA’s SuperTracker tool, the recent changes to the National School Lunch Program, increasing the number of farmer’s markets that accept SNAP benefits, and USDA’s Know Your Farmer Know Your Food program, to improve food choices, diet quality and access to healthy food.

We’re all allowed to our own opinions about the merits of each of the programs mentioned above. Overall, though, instead of turning a scientific study into a political tool to tout the Obama administration, this report would have provided much more beneficial information if it had looked at consumption rates of key food groups to better understand the decisions working age adults are making to follow a well-balanced diet. How has consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables changed over the years? Where are consumers getting most of their protein, and how have those patterns changed? What attributed to the increase in fiber? How have physical exercise amounts changed among working age adults? Those are questions to which I'd like to see answers. Those are the questions that may help farmers and ranchers adapt their operations to meet changing consumer demand and preferences, instead of references to USDA programs that were only in place for, at most, the final two years of this study.



Comments (3) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

vman    
Iowa City, IA  |  January, 16, 2014 at 12:50 PM

This is an improvement? We've cut calories and fat and yet as as society, we're fatter and sicker than ever. The real problem is that over the past 7 or 8 decades, we've been steadily replacing saturated fats with sugars, grains and processed seed oils (canola, soybean, corn etc), all of which are having a disastrous effect on our health. This is all the result of bad science and bad politics that started in the 1940s and 50s and really ramped up starting in the 1980s. I try to live by the policy "if my great-great-grandparents would recognize what I'm eating, I shouldn't be eating it either!"

Jason    
Mead, CO  |  January, 16, 2014 at 05:45 PM

vman, You hit the nail on the head. All this data from a study we paid for is useless, not needed and pointless. Not sure how we can round that up anymore. All forcing information down our throats that's incorrect. All Americans have to do is stop eating all the processed garbage, needless grains and sugar and they can eat all the fat they want without issue. Where's the real data that can actually help someone?

Glenda    
January, 21, 2014 at 09:16 AM

vman and Jason are absolutely correct. We don't need to eat grains or anything else except just the fat of the land. Anyone who ever read Steinbeck knows how during the great depression (the first one, not this one) all the prideful poor folk thrived off the fat of the land. The world's poor could be doing that right now if we weren't all the time giving them food stamps and other free stuff. Weren't any fat migrant workers back there in the first great depression. Mighty healthy crowd, they were. Now we feed 'em and coddle 'em and all they do is grow fat and sick and cost us more mney.


Scout™ 4WD UTV

Work, play or explore with the Case IH Scout™ utility vehicles. They offer plenty of power, accessories to match any ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight