Processing...

Latest News

Voters Approve Ohio Issue Two For Livestock

11/03/2009 09:57PM

Average rating:  (0)

Subscribe
Friend's Email *  
Your Email
Subject * 
Message
Verify
If the number is difficult to decipher try selecting Refresh
 
Ohio voters have delivered a victory to large farm operators, approving a new industry-dominated board to oversee livestock care.

With 45 percent of precincts reporting Tuesday, the issue was leading 65 percent to 35 percent.

The measure was designed to thwart efforts of animal rights groups such as the Humane Society of the United States that are intent on outlawing the close confinement of laying hens, breeding sows and veal calves.

Laws outlawing keeping those animals in cramped cages or crates have passed in seven states.

The ballot issue was viewed as a blueprint for other rural states to avoid such laws being imposed.

Ohio's livestock care board will have 13 members of both parties representing farmers, veterinarians, food safety experts, and consumers. It will have one animal rights advocate.

The Humane Society vowed Tuesday to mount a future Ohio ballot campaign instituting farm animal protections.

(Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
4 Comments
Glenn R. CarlisleDover-OH Tuscarawas CountyNovember 09, 2009 08:09
We are all impacted by Issue 2. Any farmer with livestock is required to meet the standard as interpreted by the board-who may serve for free ??,Eventually the Ohio Dep't of Agriculture(ODA)will have to have some personell involvement..USHS will not be deterred by listening to the VOTE of the MAJORITY but will immediately wage a campaign to set aside the common sense vote- and will slant all livestock producers as "evil factory farmers".Every Nutrition client I serve in 6 counties IS family owned and operated. The appeal will -as always- be to cause knee jerk reactions in the sadly food supply ignorant city folk. We leave them ignorant on food production practices at our peril !..
Dr. Don SandersMarysville, OHNovember 04, 2009 04:40
This wasn't a victory for large farms! It was written to establish standards for all of animal agriculture. There are just as many small farms or more that need guidance regarding large farms. It was written to bring a semblance of order to establish guidelines based on sound science and ethics rather than the cachony of emotion that doesn't have a foundation for healthy food animal production.
margo sionia, miNovember 04, 2009 10:52
Congrats Ohio Farmers - Hopefully Michigan is just as smart. But, then again we do have Detroit!
Becky VincentNovember 04, 2009 10:35
This is not just a victory to large farm operators! It is a victory to each and every "family farm" who wants to keep their right to raise animals based on sound science, not emotion, providing safe, affordable, local food. Thank you to all who support me- the 4th generation family farmer!