The disease triad
- Youth “Telling the Beef Story” video blog winners announced

- U.S. to seek G8 support for oil reserve release
- Argentine province set to hike taxes, farmers strike
- Wheat posts biggest gain in 6 weeks on Wednesday
- Implanting nursing beef calves mid-summer returns over $435/hour
- AFBF: Multi-legged stool best approach for Farm Bill
- My Beef Checkoff: May dairy edition
- CME to pare back plan for expanded grain trading
- Forage focus: M&M determines hay quality
- Cushing crude oil inventories at record levels
- Group claims breakthrough with discovery of new steak cut
- Jolley: Five Minutes with Jim Avila’s “slimey” tweets
- They’re not all food Luddites
- Standoff in cash cattle as beef prices slip, feeders higher
- Temple Grandin enters New York Times' essay contest
- Learning more about what consumers are saying
- Update: A meat eater wins The NY Times contest
- Sustainability: new term, traditional values
- Dicey odds for continued drought
- Kindergarten for calves
- Commentary: Searching for beef’s next toe-stubber
- Commentary: Why The New York Times' essay contest is phony
- Commentary: Vegan sweet dreams
- BSE found in central California, USDA confirms
- Food industry battling back from 'pink slime' hysteria
- Slime time at AMI: expo panel on rehabbing LFTB
- Science must guide ag policy
- Vigilante cattlemen arrested for beating alleged rustler
- Veterinarian responds to New York Times essay
- Commentary: Advise and dissent
Kelly Lechtenberg, DVM, PhD, Midwest Veterinary Services, Oakland, Neb., says there are three elements that make up the “disease triad” in feedlot cattle. Speaking at the 2011 Annual Western Veterinary Conference, Lechtenberg says those three elements are pathogen factors, host factors and environmental factors.
Pathogen factors include dose, reservoir, environmental hardiness, contagiousness, infectivity and virulence. Questions to consider are how contagious are the pathogens? What kind of contact is necessary for transmission (direct aerosol or fecal-oral such as IBR, BVD, Salmonella vs. intermediate host such as anaplasmosis, liver flukes, etc.)? Much of this, Lechtenberg says, is largely out of our control.
Environmental factors include sanitation (mud, dust), contact pattern (continuous vs. all-in/all-out), animal density, animal movement between groups, group size and social stress. “The likelihood of effective contact is the percentage of the group that will have contact with a pathogen-shedding individual that results in infection/disease,” Lechtenberg explains.
What influences that likelihood is immune system competence/immunosuppression that are influenced by factors such as internal parasite burden, stress (environmental, social, disease), nutritional deficiency and level of heterosis/genetics. Also involved are animal density, group size and pathogen factors such as contagiousness/ virulence.
Host/animal factors in the disease triad are influenced by age, innate resistance, immune status, nutritional status and genetics /heterosis.
Lechtenberg says there some areas where we can intervene to have an effect on the disease triad as there are several environmental and animal contributors to transmission or disease. Questions that need to be asked include: Can housing (heat, cold, dust, moisture, etc.) impact likelihood and extent of transmission? Can animal source, age, or other factors affect disease risk? Can the way you are administering health, nutrition and animal care affect disease risk?
Lechtenberg notes that there are areas of intervention that include the reservoir, environmental and animal contributors to transmission, environmental and animal contributors to disease and the timing of transmission.





Comments (0)
Leave a comment