Commentary: Meat makes the man

 Resize text        

Get ready for a stunning revelation concerning human behavior, courtesy of group of psychologists who apparently spent a fair amount of time and research dollars on the study.

Are you ready? Here it is: “Men in Western countries connect eating meat—especially muscle meat like steak—with masculinity. Vegetables, however, were not considered masculine.”

I know—shocking.

According to Paul Rozin, professor of Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, Brian Wansink, professor of Consumer Behavior at Cornell University and Julia M. Hormes of Louisiana State University, men tend to forge a strong link between eating meat and the perception of masculinity.

The research is scheduled to be published in the October 2012 issue of theJournal of Consumer Research, but thanks to a number of eagle-eyed reporters, we have an advance on the insight that not only men, but people in general view male meat eaters as being more masculine than non-meat eaters.

In a summary that didn’t mince words, according to more than one news report, the authors stated: “To the strong, traditional, macho, bicep-flexing, All-American male, red meat is a strong, traditional, macho, bicep-flexing, All-American food. Soy is not.”

To eat soy-based veggie foods, most men, the study concluded, would have to give up a food they see as strong and powerful—like themselves—for a food they saw as “weak and wimpy.”

Shocking news

How did the researchers arrive at these eye-opening conclusions? They conducted a number of experiments that examined metaphors and certain foods, such as meat and milk, and found that people rated meat as more masculine than vegetables.

They also found that meat generated more masculine words when people discussed it, and that people viewed male meat eaters as being more masculine than non-meat eaters.

Hope you were sitting down for that nugget of insight. I know I’ll never look at meat-eating quite the same way anymore.

Most of the studies took place in the United States and Britain, but the authors also analyzed 23 languages that use gendered pronouns and discovered that even in most languages other than English, meat was related to the male gender.

What are we to make of this groundbreaking research? The authors helpfully noted that if marketers or health advocates want to “counteract the powerful associations” between meat and masculinity, they need to address the metaphors that shape consumer attitudes.

For example, they wrote that an education campaign urging people to eat more soy or vegetables would be a tough sell, but reshaping soy burgers into products that resemble burgers would be more successful.

We can only pray that the leading food processing company executives are paying attention.

Along those same lines, and as a helpful public service, I’d like to share a couple other sociological studies soon to be published in that August Journal of Consumer Research:

  • Having more money makes people seem more desirable as a mate or partner.
  • People withfriends seem to be happier than those who are perceived as isolated loners.
  • Sex is an activity that many people view as preferable to not having sex.

I realize that all this high-powered socio-insight on meat and machismo can be tough to digest, but it didn’t stop people logging onto vegetarian websites to return fire with some stunning comebacks:

  • “Vegetarians and in particular, vegans, possess a ‘strength’ that surpasses that of any consumers and wearers of animal products.”
  • “I've met two country boys who worked in an abattoir after growing up on cattle ranches, and they became vegetarians as soon as they left their jobs a week after starting.”
  • “The most powerful animals on earth are herbivores. Just a few for you meat-eating macho bunch to think on: elephants, rhinos, horses, etc.”
  • “Gladiators were vegetarians, and I don’t think many would have messed with them.”

There you go: Irrefutable evidence that veggie-loving gladiators two thousand years ago were among the most macho men around.

But if that were true, wouldn’t it lend credence to the epithet, Eat soy and die?

Just asking.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Dan Murphy, a veteran food-industry journalist and commentator.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Sponsored Links


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight