Commentary: To cull or not to cull?

 Resize text        

Few animals worldwide are as iconic as the kangaroo. As a first-time visitor Australia years ago, I can testify that one of the most sought-after encounters I wanted to experience was a chance to see these unique marsupials in the wild.

By my third or fourth trip there, though, after taking hundreds of photos, after seeing hundreds of dead kangaroos along rural highways in New South Wales and especially after seeing a large and nearly domesticated group of roos roaming a local golf course night after night—patiently waiting just off the 18th green at duskas the last golfers finished their rounds—I began to recognize the parallels between Australia’s kangaroo and North America’s deer populations.

Including the problem of overpopulation.

The exploding numbers, exacerbated in both countries by farming and settlements that increase the available food sources (kangaroos feast on irrigated golf courses during eastern Australia’s long, dry summers, for example) and the absence of predators that would ordinarily exercise rigid population control, are negatively affecting their respective ecosystems.

In the United States, we’ve driven wolves and cougars out of the Eastern states; in Australia, there never were any large carnivores that hunted roos.

The result, both here and there, is that efforts are underway to control the populations of these large, browsing animals, which threaten the eco-balance of forest, range and grassland areas. Here, we call it “wildlife management.” Aussies are a bit more forthright in labelling it “kangaroo culling.”

A proposal to cull some 2,000 eastern grey kangaroos from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) surrounding the country’s national capital of Canberra—a jurisdiction roughly equivalent to our District of Columbia, only three times larger—has animal activists up in arms Down Under.

A predictable response

Members of several animal welfare groups, including the Australian Society for Kangaroos, are launching protests as ACT government officials announced closure of nine nature reserves for a couple weeks to facilitate the culling.(And don’t you love Australian—actually, Aboriginal—geography? The reserves include the Goorooyaroo Nature Reserve, Jerrabomberra West Nature Reserve and the Wanniassa Hills Nature Reserve).

A Society spokesperson told The Canberra Times that their members would try to physically disrupt the kangaroo cull.

“We’ll mount the usual public protest, but we’ll also make it as difficult as we can for the government, the shooters and the rangers,”activist Carolyn Drew told the newspaper. “Protesters will be there, but we can’t divulge what we’ve planned. That is for everyone to find out.We’ll be out there as soon as it gets dark.”

Drew said instead of culling the kangaroos, the ACT government should develop better wildlife corridors to allow them to move freely across Canberra, adding that culling around the Wanniassa Hills would not stop the problem of motorists colliding with kangaroos in that area.

ACT Parks and Conservation Service director Daniel Iglesias told reporters the culling was essential to keep the number of kangaroos at sustainable levels so as not to have a detrimental impact on other animals and plants.

“Ensuring that grasslands and woodlands are not overgrazed will protect threatened species and ecosystems, provide habitat for creatures such as ground-feeding birds, prevent excessive soil loss and maintain sustainable numbers of kangaroos,” he said.

His comments apparently resonate with ACT residents because normally, protests against any sort of wildlife population control draw widespread public support. When wildlife biologists attempt to reduce overabundant deer populations in proximity to populated areas in Eastern and Midwestern states, for example, activists typically invoke images of Bambi, with which triggers a predictable outcry.

However, a recent survey of 600 Canberrans by the regional Territory and Municipal Services found that 79% were supportive of kangaroo culling under certain circumstances, and 70% were supportive of culling for conservation of small grassland and woodland animals.

Could it be that Aussies are better educated about ecosystem management than we are? Maybe, but more likely, they’re lifestyles bring them closer to the land and the bush, as the country’s sparsely populated grassland areas are called, and they have a better grasp of the fact that no one species can dominate if the goal is maintaining optimal balance and protection for all plants and animals.

If only we could embrace a similar understanding.

Dan Murphy is a food-industry journalist and commentator


Prev 1 2 Next All


Related Articles

No matching related articles at this time.

Sponsored Links


Comments (13) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Pat OBrien    
Australia  |  May, 30, 2012 at 04:51 PM

The problem is Dan, in the Australian Capital Territory we have a small and totally dis-functional Government that has tried to justify the kill by using shonky research by paid academics, and even more dogy surveys.

None really knows why they hate kangaroos so much, but it doesn't worry them when they approve massive developments in the very same grasslands that they claim need to be protected from the kangaroos.

No other Australian government (and we have lots of them) would dare to treat kangaroos so badly. Last year after the kills, they had to put cattle into some of the Reserves to eat the grass in case of fire.

Many Aussies absolutely refuse to visit Canberra because of these kills, and the killing has reflected badly on the perceptions that Aussies have of all their polititians. There is absolutely no excuse for the bloody and unnecessary slaughter that's happening in Canberra.

Melanie Fraser    
May, 31, 2012 at 02:31 AM

Well said Pat. Our Kangaroo's are precious native wildlife that deserve protection not culling. How many Australians are against the Canadian Seal Slaughter? Yet that is exactly what "us" Australians our doing to these amazing animals. The Governments figures are shady to suit their own motives, and now sadly so many Australians seem to view them as pests, when in fact they are not. Canberra, shame on you for this attempted mass slaughter.

Menkit Prince    
NSW  |  May, 31, 2012 at 07:34 AM

For 16 million years kangaroos have been evolving without any help from golf courses, thank you very much.

As for being 'overpopulated' or in 'exploding numbers' the contrary is true. An ecologist is calling for their nomination as threatened species in NSW - see www.kangaroosatrisk.net.

Thanks to the kangaroo industry Australia hosts the world's largest slaughter of land-based wildlife on the planet ... how shameful.

Combined with the ongoing assault from habitat loss, road kill, damage mitigation permits, hoons, drought, bush fires, floods, disease, natural and feral predators, government culls and now recreational shooters in national parks, golf courses are probably the only safe place left for our poor national icon .... some of them at least.

And for your information kangaroos have had a carnivorous predator controlling their numbers for the last 60,000 years - aborigines.

Kangaroos are not a threat to ecosystems - livestock and humans are! Kangaroos have lived in harmony with other native species who in fact rely on them. They regenerate native grasses, eat dry grasses that ignite easily in bush fires, do not cause soil erosion, do not pollute ground water or surface water, do not genergently aerate the soil and allow seeds to take root, and so on. All these ecosystem services they provide and for that we destroy their family structures and cause them great suffering.

What ingrates we humans are!

Mentally Sound    
The West  |  May, 31, 2012 at 07:52 AM

Interesting.....isn't it..........about the comments on your article and the whole failure of governments and individuals to responsibly manage animals and ecosystems. This mindset borders on mental illness.

Maybe Australia should just allocate more and more money, raise taxes higher and higher so they can keep hundreds of thousands of welfare animals........just like we do with wild horses.

MH    
Australia  |  May, 31, 2012 at 06:23 PM

Here we go again with the 'exploding numbers' myth. This is nothing more than pub spin perpetuated by those with a vested interest in kangaroo slaughter.
What is 'exacerbated in both countries by farming and settlements', is a dangerous reduction in the natural wildife of all species. It's called suburban and industrial sprawl.
The only species that is dangerously exploding in numbers is the foolish human species that blindly breeds without a thought for the future.

MH    
Australia  |  May, 31, 2012 at 06:33 PM

John Kelly, Australia's Indigenous people would only take a kangaroo to feed their family. They did not go out night after night, guiltily hiding under the cover of darkness, blasting thousands of kangaroos for blood money. Nor did they use contracted killers to do their dirty work for them.

Cooinda    
SA  |  May, 31, 2012 at 11:52 PM

Poor John Kelly, hanging on to an industry that is in its own death throws. Can't expect much common sense from this guy. Yes, John Kelly did say that ALL female kangaroos have twins! I don't know what is worse, what this guy says, or the people who believe him.
Still, can't expect much from an article in the Drovers! (CattleNetwork) - Talk about the 'fox looking after the hen house.'

nick m    
May, 31, 2012 at 08:21 PM

balanced, sensible article Dan.
It is a shame that no-one who has commented has attempted to apply any of those traits to their response!
@ Menkit - you still believe in Santaclaus if you believe that ridiculous report (kangaroo'satrisk ). Figures used were in the worst drought for 100 years. Take same fiures in two years and you will have completely different results. This has always been the case, before white man put in dams everywhere - 90% of population would crash in drought.

Menkit    
NSW  |  June, 17, 2012 at 09:24 AM

Nick M thinks that if not for dams built by man 90% kangaroos would die during drought. Then how did kangaroos survive the last 16 million years without these 'life-saving' dams? Are you saying there were no droughts prior to white man? Have you taken into consideration how many kangaroos die as a result of barbed wire fences/roadkill/dogs/hoons/government culls/kangaroo-hating farmers/bush fire/floods/disease/natural predators not to mention the world's largest slaughter of land-based wildlife on the planet, all orchestrated by the infamous John Kelly?

The benefit of dams is far outweighed by the threats to kangaroo populations which explains WHY they are 'at risk'. I'd say you are the one who believes in santa claus if you think kangaroos are overpopulated because of dams!

Kim    
Perth  |  May, 31, 2012 at 11:40 PM

I just rolled around on the floor laughing when I saw John Kelly's name. Isn't this the same Kelly who said all female Kangaroos have twins.. lol!!! Say no more!!!

MH    
Australia  |  June, 01, 2012 at 06:27 PM

Yes. I'm sure he gets these pseudo 'facts' from the weirdos in the shooters party who can't wait to get their itchy and grubby fingers on the triggers. "We're huntin' them thar varmints" [because we have no life and can't get a real job].

Lyn    
Australia  |  June, 01, 2012 at 09:06 PM

Are 'Aussies better educated about ecosystem management than we are?'
The answer is a resounding 'NO!" We Aussies have the world's worst record for the annihilation of native species in just over 200 years, - and the annihilation continues. Canberra's annual massacre is only one example of this. With the usual dodgy reasons of course. At the same time the annual quota for the kangaroo 'industry' (John Kelly) has been increased by almost two million.

So many of our unique animals, birds and reptiles are going the way of the dodo right now, and when Governments decide to stop slaughtering and try conservation it is usually too late.

Read about the current plight of the Tasmanian Devil. It will be extinct within the next 25 years.

Our wonderful Governments have never advocated living with and appreciating our wildlife. They are barely tolerated outside zoos, and slaughtered if they breed successfully in the wild.


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight