HSUS earns low rating among charities

 Resize text        

Once again, the American Institute of Philanthropy has awarded the Humane Society of the United States a “D” rating in its Charity Rating Guide. The report, which AIP publishes three times each year, is based on a rigorous analysis of charitable organizations, and serves as a guide to donors who look for independent information before selecting charities to support.

According to AIP, the groups in the top-rated list generally spend 75 percent or more of their budgets on programs, spend $25 or less to raise $100 in public support, do not hold excessive assets in reserve, and receive "open-book" status for disclosure of basic financial information and documents to AIP.

You can read more about the organization’s criteria for rating charities on the CharityWatch.org website

The Center for Consumer Freedom notes that last year AIP gave HSUS a “D” grade twice, due to the animal rights group’s lackluster performance in using donors’ contributions. According to the report, HSUS spends up to 49 cents to raise every dollar, while spending as little as 49 percent of its budget on programs.

Even PETA, best known for publicity stunts involving partially naked women, topped HSUS with a “C-plus” grade in the latest AIP report,

The AIP report groups charities by type of mission, helping potential donors compare among similar charities such as those focused on cancer research, hunger or homelessness. Among the category for Animal and Animal Protection, several earned spots among the report’s top-rated charities. These include the Animal Welfare Institute, Farm Sanctuary and the Humane Farming Association.

These organizations, while apparently more forthright in their financial disclosures and efficient in appropriating funds, are not especially friendly to commercial livestock production.

The motto listed on the Animal Welfare Institute’s website states: “Working to abolish factory farms, support high-welfare family farms and achieve humane transport and slaughter for all animals.”

Farm Sanctuary takes the message even further, stating the organization “works to protect farm animals from cruelty, inspire change in the way society views and treats farm animals, and promote compassionate vegan living.”

Humane Farming Association lists its goals to “protect farm animals from cruelty and abuse, to protect the public from the misuse of antibiotics, hormones, and other chemicals used on factory farms, and to protect the environment from the impacts of industrialized animal factories.”


Sponsored Links


Comments (13) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

    
August, 31, 2011 at 10:23 AM

Groups such as NARSC and IFAW should be reviewed and promoted to the public

Janet Weeks    
Sacramento  |  August, 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM

Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) ranked #1, Top Nonprofit: National Animal Welfare, Rights, & Protection by Philanthropedia:

http://www.myphilanthropedia.org/top-nonprofits/national/animal-welfare-rights-protection

Tom Krall    
Lebanon, Pa  |  September, 01, 2011 at 09:10 AM

Wow! if the #1 animal rights organization gets a grade D where does that leave PETA and all the others?

Dr. Mauck    
Sullivan, IL  |  August, 31, 2011 at 11:12 AM

All of these so-called animal welfare and animal-rights groups have been radicalized and are not what they profess to be. They are fronts for and/or allied with anarchist and socialist/communist activists. Also, the HSUS spends far more on retirement funds for its executives than it does on any humane shelters.

Janet Weeks    
Sacramento  |  August, 31, 2011 at 02:44 PM

Using such inflammatory words as “so-called,” “radicalized,” “fronts,” “anarchist,” and “socialist/communist,” and adding a “Dr.” to one’s name without reputable documentation or proof, does absolutely nothing to advance a person’s credibility.

What remains true is that Philanthropedia ranked the HSUS #1, Top Nonprofit in the category of National Animal Welfare, Rights, & Protection.

http://www.myphilanthropedia.org/top-nonprofits/national/animal-welfare-rights-protection

AND, Philanthropedia is the highly rated brainchild of the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

http://csi.gsb.stanford.edu/philanthropedia

AND, “A study developed by nonprofit consultants reported in the Stanford Social Innovation Review—an award-winning magazine covering successful strategies of nonprofits, foundations and socially responsible businesses—gave the opinion that some watchdog groups [such as the American Institute of Philanthropy]:

Rely too heavily on simple analyses and ratios derived from poor-quality financial data;
Overemphasize financial efficiency while ignoring program effectiveness; and
Do a poor job of conducting analyses in important qualitative areas, such as management strength, governance quality and organizational transparency.

Specifically, this study gave the opinion that AIP’s [American Institute of Philanthropy’s] shortcomings include a “gotcha” mentality and lack of transparency …”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Institute_of_Philanthropy

john639    
SF  |  August, 31, 2011 at 11:53 PM

This article is such nonsense. This is nothing but pure propaganda paid for and promoted by Richard Berman and co. They get paid BIG MONEY to post stuff like this because it hurts the profits of Cattle and Beef corporations. www.bermanexposed.org

Lynn Henderson    
St. Louis MO  |  September, 02, 2011 at 11:26 AM

It should be pointed out the ratings agency gave 4-H an A-. Way to go 4-H!

Lynn Henderson    
St. Louis MO  |  September, 02, 2011 at 11:26 AM

It should be pointed out the ratings agency gave 4-H an A-. Way to go 4-H!

Dr Catharina Berge    
Belgium  |  September, 05, 2011 at 03:59 AM

As a professional, who has dedicated my life to animal welfare and health, and have sworn an oath to do so, I believe that the veterinary profession has a good idea of what is sound animal welfare and not. I think that an animal welfare organization that is not endorsed by the veterinary professionals (at least many them) is not going to actively and efficiently be able to improve the life of animals. It is so easy to be critical...not so easy to make a change. I challenge those that are critical to work actively and within the food production industry to make a change.

Dr Catharina Berge    
Belgium  |  September, 05, 2011 at 03:59 AM

As a professional, who has dedicated my life to animal welfare and health, and have sworn an oath to do so, I believe that the veterinary profession has a good idea of what is sound animal welfare and not. I think that an animal welfare organization that is not endorsed by the veterinary professionals (at least many them) is not going to actively and efficiently be able to improve the life of animals. It is so easy to be critical...not so easy to make a change. I challenge those that are critical to work actively and within the food production industry to make a change.

Dairycowgirl    
Maryland  |  September, 06, 2011 at 08:31 AM

I live very close to the headquarters of the HSUS. For all of you that are supporting them, just take a trip and visit their office. You would be surprised at how much money was spent on decorating. If that isn't enough they do not support local shelters which actually take care of the animals. I know several people who worked for them under the old staff and left when Pacelle took over. I deal with humane orgs a lot in my work and I have to say the only thing HSUS is good at is raising money. They have not done anything to help our local animals. If you want the truth just look up their financial report. This is public record anyone can do it. I suggest doing this for any "charity" you donate to.


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight