Jolley: Bill Bullard’s bombshells from Billings

 Resize text        

How to Win Friends and Influence People is one of the first bestselling self-help books ever published. Written by Dale Carnegie and first published in 1936, it has sold 15 million copies world-wide.  Here’s a safe bet: neither Bill Bullard nor anyone else at R-CALF is among those 15 million who bought the book.

Frustrated with their ongoing negotiations with the USDA over the proposed APHIS rule titled “Bovine spongiform encephalopathy – Importation of bovines and bovine products,” R-CALF made a fourth request asking for a second extension of the comment period originally scheduled to end on May 21. Secretary Vilsack granted their first request and gave them until June 14.  Unable to respond by that date, R-CALF wanted more time to review the rule’s details. 

Evidently, Mr. Vilsack and friends thought enough time had transpired and demurred.

Mr. Bullard was not pleased.  He fired off a nastygram that should have been printed on asbestos if that stuff was still legal. He started the letter with “In my rushed efforts to provide thoughtful and well-reasoned comments to what is the most bizarre and obfuscated rulemaking I have witnessed in over a decade…”

Here is a little taste - “The most plausible explanation for your refusal is that you do not want to give the public sufficient time to discover the dishonest and corrupt nature of your Proposed Rule.  Your agency is wholly lacking in accountability, credibility and integrity. It is impossible for the public interest to even be considered, let alone protected, by an agency that resorts to outright lies in order to further its own political agenda.”

I’m sure that little kiss on the cheek caused Mr. Vilsack to take a step back and say, “Why sure, we would be delighted to give you as much time as you need.  I’ll wait right here until I hear from you.  No rush, no problem.”

Or maybe he thought an extra 24 days should have been more than enough to craft a well-written objection to the proposed rule.  Whatever Vilsack was thinking, Bullard’s note was intemperate and probably pushed R-CALF far away from the negotiating table.  I’m guessing the R-CALF seat is now in the hallway next to the room where the USDA keeps their office cleaning supplies.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Bill and I think his organization has some important things to say about how the cattle business and the federal government should work together.  R-CALF represents a large and influential constituency and their voice needs to be heard, loud and clear; not as a faint echo from way out in left field.

But I’m confident Bullard and R-CALF are fully capable of raising their voices so they can still be heard from wherever the shouting comes from.  I’m also confident that when the shouting becomes that intense, the listening goes away.

Chuck Jolley is a free lance writer, based in Kansas City, who covers a wide range of ag industry topics for Vance Publishing.


Sponsored Links


Comments (6) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Darol    
ohio  |  June, 19, 2012 at 09:56 AM

Chuck, you always have great thought, but, what does one do when USDA hides behind stone buildings full of bureaucrats and basically does whatever they want, with a close eye on huge business contributors. How do you get them to listen? How loud can a letter shout and get a valid reply. RCALF will shout and try to get real thought and NCBA sucks up to USDA and sets in their front row meetings. Neither wins. How about the NAIS and ADT that you wrote so brilliantly opposing? Over 90% of cattle producers were against it in voice and vote, then USDA steam rolls right on. Gets a little old??

John Munsell    
Miles City, MT  |  June, 19, 2012 at 11:21 AM

Chuck, there are times when "tactful negotiation" accomplishes nothing, especially when dealing with a bureaucracy like USDA which eruditely perceives it is accountable to no one. People claimed I was obstinately wrong when I filed suit against the agency, attempting to force it to implement changes in its meat inspection policies. Although the suit failed, the changes I requested are one-by-one being implemented by the agency. One reason the 3-judge appellate court rejected my suit was because I acted too kindly with the agency (it's in the record!). Therefore, the lesson to be learned here is that when one is "negotiating" with USDA, one should be forthrightly blunt, which is exactly what R-Calf is doing.

Japan and Germany steamrolled the world in the late 30's and early 40's, until honest and courageous people opposed oppression, at great cost. Likewise, USDA will do whatever it desires until gutsy folks like R-Calf step up to the plate.

Somtimes, we gotta fight fire with fire.

John Munsell

Terry S. Singeltary Sr.    
Texas  |  July, 18, 2012 at 03:35 PM

The USDA et al steamrolled the OIE over BSE. both of which are stacked with industry reps. sound science went out the door a long time ago. these TSE prions have mutated, and mutated again, become more virulent, and all these two agency's do is change the rules to fit their agenda, which is NOT consumer safety, and nothing but trade. the dumbest thing they ever did was exempt atypical scrapie from scrapie trade protocols, and made it a legally trading commodity.

a bit of history on dumb and dumber, and TSE prion disease, and the trading there from, for anyone interested;



Tuesday, July 17, 2012


O.I.E. BSE, CWD, SCRAPIE, TSE PRION DISEASE Final Report of the 80th General Session, 20 - 25 May 2012


http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2012/07/oie-bse-cwd-scrapie-tse-prion-disease.html



layperson


terry

Cody    
Kansas  |  June, 22, 2012 at 07:35 AM

Personally,I think R-CALF makes all of us look bad. Yes, a couple years ago I would have said that they are working for me as a cattleman, but today, all they do is hoop and hollar, personally attack folks, and accomplish nothing. Whatever happened to actually working for what is right? They just want their name in the press, and if they get a little attention, they think they accomplished nothing, but they are wrong. I think we need groups that work for our industry and make the government accountable, but I am glad I dropped R-CALF because they don't speak for me. And its my opinion, they do not speak for the majority of us.

Chuck    
Kansas  |  June, 22, 2012 at 09:48 AM

Great comments by all 3 gentlemen; thoughtful and well-written without vitriol and no ALL CAPS ranting. To clarify my point, USDA had given R-CALF three extensions to state their position and they still wanted more time. I think (this time) the USDA was justified in saying no. Bill's ranting response will gain him and his organization nothing. The USDA was more than fair; R-CALF failed to deliver.

It seems to me that Bill's rant would have served a better purpose if it came after he had delivered R-CALF's comments on the proposed rule and they were rejected or ignored by USDA.

Jasper    
MT  |  June, 25, 2012 at 09:40 AM

R-CALF is sold out to anti-farm activist cult Food & Water Watch. Nothing good can come of it. Bullard has shown his true character. Hopefully Vilsack will now ignore these flaming whackos.


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight