Proposal could put U.S. cattle herd at risk of FMD

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

The Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association (TSCRA) submitted comments today in opposition to a recent proposal by the United States Department of Agriculture-Animal Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) that could put the U.S. cattle herd at a greater risk of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD).

USDA-APHIS has proposed a rule that would allow for the importation of fresh, maturated, deboned beef from a region in Brazil into the United States.

According to TSCRA President Pete Bonds, Brazil has a long history with FMD and lacks strict control measures to properly mitigate the risk of FMD into the United States should certain types of fresh beef be imported.

“Protecting the U.S. cattle industry from a catastrophic foreign animal disease like FMD is a major priority for TSCRA,” said Pete Bonds, rancher and TSCRA president. “And although we certainly support free trade with foreign countries that have a proven history of controlling animal diseases, we do not believe Brazil has met, and can consistently guarantee, the standards necessary to keep FMD out of the United States.”

Bonds says that many beef producers in Texas and the Southwest remember all too clearly the devastating effects of FMD the last time it was in the United States in 1929.

“Given the extreme level of uncertainty surrounding Brazil’s ability to control FMD, and the fact that our national cattle herd is at its lowest since the 1950s, we simply cannot afford to take this large of a risk,” Bonds continued.

In addition to the risk analysis USDA-APHIS conducted for the Brazil rule, they also requested public comment on an evaluation that would serve as a decision making tool to determine whether and under what conditions to allow imports of fresh meat and live animals from the Patagonia region of Argentina to the United States.

TSCRA is opposed to both USDA-APHIS risk analyses for Brazil and Argentina based upon third party scientific reviews that acknowledged issues with both risk assessments.

Bonds says that Brazil and Argentina’s trend of compliance problems and deficiencies with routine USDA and European Commission food safety audits also present concern. Additionally, APHIS has conducted a number of site visits to verify animal health and disease information; however, the reviews appear to lack transparency since the full results of these site visits have not yet been made public.

“The fact is that neither of these regions can prove they’ve successfully and continually eradicated FMD,” said Bonds. “That’s a huge red flag for U.S. cattle producers.”

Source: TSCRA News Release



Comments (4) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Lovecows    
USA  |  April, 23, 2014 at 03:15 PM

Please keep up the fight against government invasion into the cattle food market.

John Snoberger    
CA  |  April, 26, 2014 at 01:54 AM

Reports?

LILLIAN YONTZ    
Ohio  |  April, 26, 2014 at 10:32 AM

Aphis and USDA should had figure that years ago. It will happen here eventually. Maybe they want an outbrake of FMD to have something to do.

Dr John Radosevich    
wyoming  |  April, 30, 2014 at 02:00 PM

Homeland security has all of the guns, swat teams and everything else to take care of a FMD outgbreak


Bobcat 3650

The Bobcat 3650 utility vehicle offers heat and air conditioning, a hydrostatic drive and the capacity to operate front-mounted PTO ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight