House, Senate urge EPA to adjust ethanol mandate

 Resize text        

WASHINGTON – The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) stands with 156 U.S. Representatives and 25 U.S. Senators in their quest to bring commonsense to Washington, D.C., and relief to rural America by encouraging Environmental Protection Agency Administrator (EPA) Lisa Jackson to implement a waiver to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). Last week, more than 150 representatives signed a letter to Administrator Jackson and today more than 20 senators did the same. The letters went to Administrator Jackson because EPA was granted the authority in the 2005 Energy Policy Act, which set the initial RFS, and in the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act, which expanded the fuels standard, to waive the RFS because of severe economic or environmental harm.

In the House, the letter was a bipartisan effort led by Congressmen Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.); Jim Matheson (D-Utah); Steve Womack (R-Ark.); and Mike McIntyre (D-N.C.).

“The RFS mandate has created a domino effect. Tightening supplies have already driven up the price of corn, and the extreme weather being experienced by much of the nation will only further increase prices.  I am pleased that my colleagues in the Senate have joined me and 155 other Members of the House of Representatives in urging EPA Administrator Jackson to act now to make a critical reduction in the RFS for 2012,” said Rep. Goodlatte. “We should not be in a position where we are choosing between fuel and feed for our livestock.”

NCBA President J.D. Alexander said his organization supports American ethanol. Alexander, who is a cattleman from Nebraska, said corn-based ethanol has done a lot to stabilize many rural communities in his state and yields a co-product, dried distillers’ grains, which many cattlemen use as a feed ingredient. Alexander, like many of the members of Congress urging EPA to issue the waiver, is seeking a level playing field for cattlemen to compete “head-to-head” for a bushel of corn in one of the worst droughts in the nation’s history. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, roughly 70 percent of cattle producing regions are suffering from drought conditions.

“We find it concerning that these mandates are allowed to continue today in the worst drought I have seen in my lifetime. Seventy percent of cattle country is under drought conditions – this is not isolated to a certain part of the country. One has to wonder how bad the drought has to get before EPA uses its authority to grant a RFS waiver,” said Alexander. “This isn’t rocket science. Let the market work.”

The Senate letter was also a bipartisan effort led by Senators Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and Kay Hagan (D-N.C.).

"In light of the widespread droughts that are causing severe economic harm to our nation’s farmers and ranchers, I am proud that a bipartisan group of senators signed on to the Hagan/Chambliss letter that asks EPA to use its authority to waive the corn-ethanol mandate of the Renewable Fuels Standard,” said Sen. Hagan. “A waiver from the corn-ethanol mandate will provide much needed relief for livestock and poultry producers suffering from record high corn prices brought on by the worst drought in 50 years.”

The RFS requires 13.2 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol to be produced in 2012 and 13.8 billion gallons in 2013, amounts that will use about 4.7 billion and 4.9 billion bushels, respectively, of the nation’s corn. Some agricultural forecasters now are estimating that just 11.8 billion bushels of corn will be harvested this year – about 13 billion were harvested in 2011 – meaning corn-ethanol production will use about four of every 10 bushels.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Sponsored Links


Comments (3) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

MEL    
NE  |  August, 07, 2012 at 11:07 PM

thanks for asking someone else to do the dirty work of hitting the grain farmer when he's down all you ever want is cheap feed

todd phillips    
ar  |  August, 08, 2012 at 09:31 AM

A level field is not a cheap shot make corn compete with other fuel sources without the mandates

Mark    
IL  |  August, 08, 2012 at 01:10 PM

Mel, if you look elsewhere on Drover today ("Still, feedyards are losing in excess of $220 on every animal they send to market. Packer margins slipped further into the red, with losses now exceeding $40 per head, according to the Sterling Beef Profit Tracker") you'll understand why livestock producers don't have a lot of sympathy for the grain farmer. If yield drops by half and the price of corn doubles the grain farmer makes out fine, only the livestock producer is hurt. And just maybe the grain farmers here in Illinois won't stampede over each
other to spend $10,000+ for an acre of land.


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight