The price of food

 Resize text        

In spite of recent spikes in food prices, the average American’s spending on groceries continues to decline in proportion to total spending.

A report from NPR this week, using figures from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, compares prices and spending on individual foods and groceries overall, between 1982 and 2012. In 1982, about 14 percent of an average American’s spending went toward groceries. By 2012, that percentage dropped to below 9 percent.

Back in 1982, meat accounted for the largest share of grocery spending at 31.3 percent. Today, spending on meat has declined to 21.5 percent of the total, with processed foods and sweets moving into the top spot at 22.9 percent.

One might think the changes in overall grocery spending is due to people eating more meals away from home, or that the reduction in spending on meat reflects a drop-off in meat consumption, but the figures suggest the real reason is that prices simply are lower.

In inflation-adjusted dollars, prices in almost all major food categories have declined significantly since 1982. Looking at meats, the price of pork chops has dropped by 37.9 percent, chicken legs by 35.2 percent, steak by 30 percent, ground beef by 19.9 percent and bacon by 12.9 percent.

Prices for many fruits, vegetables and other foods also have dropped significantly since 1982. Some exceptions include prices for flour and bread, which have increased by 0.2 and 12.2 percent respectively. Among vegetables, the price of peppers increased by 34 percent, likely reflecting the growing popularity of spicy Hispanic-styled food in the United States over the last 30 years.

Of course, some of the food elitists who oppose modern agricultural methods will denounce these figures, arguing we need to return to smaller-scale, less efficient production systems of the past, and accept the higher food prices that inevitably would result. Their arguments ignore the benefits of efficiency-enhancing practices and technologies that boost food production while reducing resource consumption and environmental impact. Check out our webinar with Dr. Frank Mitloehner from the University of California and Dr. Jude Capper from Washington State University to learn how modern agriculture produces more food with less land, less water and reduced emissions of greenhouse gasses.


Sponsored Links


Comments (9) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Saltporkdoc    
Toledo, OH  |  June, 09, 2012 at 08:04 AM

No offense, but what might the author of the study be smoking? I'm on a fixed income. No "expenses have changed, but where I used to eat meat 3-4 times a week, fruit and veggies daily, pay my rent and other ongoing living expenses, I've had meat once in the last month, fruits and veggies twice in the past 3 weeks, alternate paying rent with purchase of my prescription meds, buy no new clothing, drive a 12 yr old truck in desperate need of repair work, haven't been to a movie in 2 years nor a concert/stage show in 7 years.
I'm a diabetic, have had a spinal cord injury and must consider bancrupcy for the second time due to medical bills.
I do NOT blame the American rancher/farmer. They work extremely hard for their relatively fixed incomes and they do a fine job. Government is the culprit. They MUST turn off the printing press and cease the endless spending!

jaxboy    
Florida  |  June, 09, 2012 at 08:41 AM

I'm in the same boat. I'm dead broke by the end of the first week with 1 trip to the grocery store, and have to beg off family to make it to the end of the month. My 14 year old car has a blown intake manifold gasket, so I have to refill the radiator every 20 miles or so. This time last year, I actually had enough money left over to buy a cd or so every month. I, too, am disabled, so a job, were there any, is out of the question. If I could afford the legal expenses, I would declare bankruptcy. As it is, I just don't pay the credit cards.

hpw3506    
Georgia  |  June, 09, 2012 at 08:17 AM

I don't know where the author shops but everywhere I shop the price of food has increased. We eat less meat because it is more expensive. Even fresh vegetables are more expensive.

backwaterbilly    
s.c.  |  June, 09, 2012 at 09:36 AM

The author is either on CRACK or has never been in a grocery store.He is also pushing GMO crops, which have not been tested enough for nutritional values & resistance to herbicides & the effects on humans.

jmcv02    
manhattan, ks  |  June, 14, 2012 at 01:48 PM

backwater- the author isn't pushing GMO crops he's supporting modern agriculture. You can use traditional seed but grow it using modern methods and tools. I dont know where you have been but GMO crops have been on the market for about 4 decades now.
Maxine- Well said!

JRW    
Florida  |  June, 09, 2012 at 10:36 AM

I want some of the cheap drugs the author of the study is using. The trick he is using is the "inflation adjusted dolloars". Another statisticians trick. All I can say is that eevery time I go to the grocery store the price of items is going up or the package weight is going down.

Mel in MONTANA    
June, 09, 2012 at 11:35 AM

Of all the sites, this one should have checked the "basic cost" indicators...i.e, the "futures market" for LIVE BEEF and LEAN HOGS - from 1982 and today!... that is the basic, in the field, MEAT COSTS!... the mark ups and middle men have remained similar...our cost of shipping has more than doubled - which is STILL PAID by us, the CONSUMER!.. I fully agree, the use of "inflation adjusted dollars" is just a trick... How many of us have actually "kept up with true inflation rates since 1982"??? I know for a fact that I haven't...since I had to take a 15% cut in pay to keep my job in 1985!!.. Now, being on SSI for my fixed income...there is NO WAY that I can afford to eat like I use to...and, I spend way more than any 14% of my income on foods these days!.. Just check the price of a big mac (plastic food) today vs 1980's... This article is a disservice!

Desiree    
Oregon  |  June, 09, 2012 at 09:46 PM

I was surprised as I read this article and wondered what in the heck I have been missing and what I was doing wrong at the grocery store.
I see I am not the only one who wonders where this information came from.

Maxine    
SD  |  June, 11, 2012 at 05:32 PM

Just a relatively sure guess, but surely the calculations use all levels of income, thus it should be no surprise that those of us with lower incomes are paying a higher price for food these days.

However, there is far more in our grocery carts than food most days.

Computers are a luxury for some of us, but many with very low incomes DO have them, as well as TV, cell phones, electronic games, etc. but we all just HATE to see food prices rise!

Only help for it appears to be vote for ONLY conservative candidates for elective offices, instead of those who say they will give us more 'freebies'.


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight