Foot-and-Mouth Disease agroterrorism threat
- Youth “Telling the Beef Story” video blog winners announced

- U.S. to seek G8 support for oil reserve release
- Argentine province set to hike taxes, farmers strike
- Wheat posts biggest gain in 6 weeks on Wednesday
- Implanting nursing beef calves mid-summer returns over $435/hour
- AFBF: Multi-legged stool best approach for Farm Bill
- My Beef Checkoff: May dairy edition
- CME to pare back plan for expanded grain trading
- Forage focus: M&M determines hay quality
- Cushing crude oil inventories at record levels
- Group claims breakthrough with discovery of new steak cut
- Jolley: Five Minutes with Jim Avila’s “slimey” tweets
- They’re not all food Luddites
- Standoff in cash cattle as beef prices slip, feeders higher
- Temple Grandin enters New York Times' essay contest
- Learning more about what consumers are saying
- Update: A meat eater wins The NY Times contest
- Sustainability: new term, traditional values
- Kindergarten for calves
- Dicey odds for continued drought
- Commentary: Searching for beef’s next toe-stubber
- Commentary: Why The New York Times' essay contest is phony
- Commentary: Vegan sweet dreams
- BSE found in central California, USDA confirms
- Food industry battling back from 'pink slime' hysteria
- Slime time at AMI: expo panel on rehabbing LFTB
- Science must guide ag policy
- Vigilante cattlemen arrested for beating alleged rustler
- Veterinarian responds to New York Times essay
- Commentary: Advise and dissent
The last time Linda Lee checked, there was no imminent threat to the U.S. food and agricultural sector.
But that could change.
“We know that terrorist groups are interested” in using unconventional agents against the food and agricultural sector, she told an audience at the FBI International Symposium on Agriculture on Tuesday.
No one has unleashed a biological agent, such as foot and mouth disease, against the livestock sector. But there have been instances of attacks on the food system. For instance, in 1984, the Rajneeshee religious cult in Oregon spiked the salad bars at several restaurants with Salmonella typhimurium. It sickened 751 people. “The reason they did that was to influence a local election… to sicken enough people so they weren’t able to vote,” said Lee, an intelligence analyst with the FBI.
Targeting the food supply creates fear; it diminishes confidence in the sector that has been attacked, she said.
And, the economic impact of a biological attack on the livestock sector would be huge.
If there is one disease that sends shivers down the spines of livestock producers and security experts alike, it is foot and mouth disease.
“There is no such thing as a small outbreak (of foot and mouth disease). If you have an outbreak, you have a big, big problem on your hands,” Terry Wilson, animal scientist at the University of California-Chico, told those attending the FBI International Symposium on Agroterrorism.
“It’s a billion-dollar disease, period,” he said.
Wilson and Japanese military official Hiroya Goto discussed a food and mouth disease outbreak in Japan in 2010 which cost that country an estimated $3.14 billion. More than 290,000 cows and pigs were culled as a result of the infection.
The Japanese military was part of the country’s response, said Goto, of the military medicine research unit of the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force.
Goto said a foot and mouth disease outbreak is a national emergency that requires immediate action because it can have a huge impact on the national economy; it can cause massive trade embargoes, and it also has psychological impacts on the public.
And, he said, it needs to be looked at as a potential biological terrorist attack.
To illustrate the disruption it can have on international trade, Taiwan was once a big provider of pork to Japan. Then, in 1997, Taiwan experienced a foot and mouth outbreak. Taiwan's pork exports to Japan went from 266 metric tons of pork in 1996 to zero in 2005.
Earlier this year, South Korea experienced a foot and mouth outbreak.
“There is a lot going on in Southeast Asia with these diseases,” Wilson said. “We want to keep the United States free of them.”
To that end, dairy producers are often referred to as the first-line of defense, keeping their eyes and ears open for any suspicious activity.
Wilson and other experts advise dairy producers to learn the signs of foot and mouth disease and report anything suspicious to a veterinarian as quickly as possible. Veterinarians then need to get laboratory conformation, since the symptoms of food and mouth disease can appear similar to other diseases, such as vesicular stomachitis virus and swine vesicular disease. The blisters that accompany these diseases look similar to one another.





Comments (4)
Leave a commentjoe taylor
Report AbuseGreat article, everyone in the livestock industry needs to be aware of the possibilities of an agri-terrorism attack and we need to be inspecting our livestock as much as we can, so we can be that 1st line of defense if an outbreak does occur.
Larry Mitchell
Report Abuseyou should read Quarantine by Gerald McCathern. Fiction novel all too familiar with the same possibility
D. Franson
Report AbuseWatch for the first outbreak, if and when it comes, to be within 100 miles downwind from the new USDA FAD Lab at Manhatten, Kansas.
G. Frank
Report AbuseFYI, in the NEXT-TO-LAST SENTENCE ("...can appear similar to other diseases, such as vesicular stomachitis virus and swine vesicular disease".) "stomachitis" SHOULD BE SPELLLED "stomatitis" (as in "vesicular stomatitis").
The consequences of foot-and-mouth disease introduced into the USA by "accidental" (unintentional) means is SCARY ENOUGH. However, with such a wide range of host/carrier species of IMPORTANCE to the MEAT ANIMAL INDUSTRIES (cattle, sheep, swine, goats), not to mention the additional host/carrier WILDLIFE/GAME species (deer, elk, antelope, bison, etc.), the INTENTIONAL introduction of foot-and-mouth (as a terrorist act) could have NIGHTMARISH effects in the USA.