LFTB concerns affect consumer behavior

 Resize text        

A survey from Red Robin restaurants indicates consumers are shying away from ground beef, but the leading nature of the survey questions suggests possible bias. Following is the news release from Red Robin:

Despite industry and government efforts to manage the controversy, concerns about so-called “pink slime” in the nation’s beef supply are influencing decisions about what they buy and eat, says a new poll from Red Robin restaurants, a leading casual-dining brand, recently conducted online by Harris Interactive among over 2,000 U.S adults age 18 and older.

After receiving hundreds of guest inquiries at Red Robin’s headquarters and in many of the company’s 460+ restaurants in North America, Red Robin, which has never served beef containing the ingredient, enlisted Harris Interactive, Inc. to conduct a poll on the “pink slime” issue.

In the study commissioned by Red Robin, 88 percent of U.S. adults are aware of the “pink slime” issue. Among those who were aware, when asked, “How concerned are you about the filler used in ground beef referred to in news stories as ‘pink slime’?,” 76 percent indicated that they were “at least somewhat concerned,” with 30 percent stating they were “extremely concerned.” Also, more than half (53 percent) of those saying they were aware of the issue took some action as a result, including researching the brands of ground beef they purchase at the grocery store and/or researching the ground beef used by restaurant brands where they eat (24 percent ). Twenty-two percent said they’ve either decreased and/or stopped altogether their consumption of foods using ground beef in restaurants, and 25 percent said they’ve either decreased and/or stopped altogether their purchases of ground beef from grocery stores.

“Red Robin has had to repeatedly assure our guests that we have never purchased or served beef containing the so-called ‘pink slime,’” said Steve Carley, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers chief executive officer. “While this kind of processed beef has been used for many years, the Harris Interactive poll shows that consumer fears are very real, and they’re not ready to let them just fade away. This underscores that our industry simply must do a better job of communicating the facts, educating consumers and regaining consumer trust in the quality of the food they buy. At Red Robin, we’ll continue to assure our guests that the quality of the food we buy and serve is a top priority.”

Red Robin’s ground beef patties are made from fresh, American-grown beef, with no added preservatives, fillers or artificial ingredients.

Editor’s comment: There is no question this issue is damaging consumer confidence and beef demand, but the wording used in these survey questions would appear to be biased and designed to generate negative responses. The question asks about concerns over “filler” used in ground beef, then refers to the product as “pink slime.” It hardly takes a Harris poll to predict how consumers would respond to that terminology. LFTB is not “filler,” it is beef. And negative reactions to the term “pink slime” are what created the backlash against the product. It would be interesting to see responses from a similar group of consumers asked the same question with less provocative and more accurate wording, such as: “How concerned are you about the use of “lean, finely textured beef” in ground-beef products?” John Maday


Prev 1 2 Next All


Sponsored Links


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Chuck    
Utah  |  April, 11, 2012 at 08:26 AM

I can understand your comments John. I've conducted surveys in the past and recognize that there is a reason for concern in the structure of the questions, but in this case I think including the term "pink slime" (as inflammatory as it is) as part of the question is justifiable. That is the term that consumers hear. It is the way they identify the product - as wrong as that might be. To gauge their reaction we need to use the words that they recognize.

The greater concern is our lack of response. Why aren't we nimble enough as an industry to have had a point of sale response out to retailers within a couple of days of the initial story? Is it the disparate nature of our organizational structure? Is it a lack of mandate? Wow! Any forward-thinking business that just lost or thought they might lose a large percentage of their business would be flipping instantly to stave off the losses. I'm not trying to be critical of any one group or organization; I'm just wondering about our structures in general.


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight