Canada’s Ag Minister expects changes to COOL, could retaliate

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Gerry Ritz, Canada's Agricultural Minister, says COOL regulations set in place by the United States are costing his country over $1 billion annually, and he’s ready to retaliate if changes aren’t made.

Flags Ritz addressed the North American Meat Association in Chicago earlier this week regarding country-of-origin labeling regulations and current and impending losses affecting his country’s livestock producers.

Tyson Foods Inc. has decided to stop buying slaughter-ready Canadian cattle, claiming the extra procedures would be too costly under the COOL regulations. The decision ends exports of 3,000 head of cattle shipped to the U.S. for processing weekly.

While Canada and Mexico are challenging COOL before the World Trade Organization as a U.S. trade barrier, Ritz is taking advantage of current discussions on the new farm bill to get the U.S. to back off COOL regulations. He says the current negotiations are an “ideal opportunity” for Canada to increase pressure on government officials to make a change.

"The farm bill is one of the president’s top priorities. It’s certainly an ideal time to increase the pressure, to make amendments in the farm bill — that would be the quickest fix," Ritz said in an interview with CBC's Lang & O'Leary Exchange on Tuesday.

Ritz says COOL is a political solution to a problem that doesn’t exist. He’s counting on industry allies Canada has within the U.S. who oppose the regulations. Those contacts have attempted to stop the policy with a court injunction.

According to Global News, Ritz said 100 senators and congressmen have also signed on to support the industry-led court action.

“That would have been unheard of a year ago,” Ritz said in a conference call from Chicago. “So the ground has shifted, the tide has changed and we feel very confident we can move forward with this repeal of COOL through the farm bill.”

While other options remain for Canada with export opportunities to Europe, Ritz says retaliatory measures towards the U.S. could be in play if COOL moves forward. Actions could include restricting imports of U.S. products.

National Farmers Union (NFU) President Roger Johnson responded, saying Ritz’s threats are unjustified and out of line. He says other countries have similar laws in place and the U.S. will not take direction from Canada.

“The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has confirmed its commitment and confidence in U.S. COOL laws on multiple occasions. The USTR has earlier said several times publically that the changes contained in USDA's final rule will bring the current COOL requirements into compliance with the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling.”

Click here for the video.

Comments (5) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Or.  |  November, 06, 2013 at 07:33 PM

You would think with all the whining Canada is doing about COOL that it might be a third world country, totally dependent on the U.S. Time they started slaughtering and marketing their own beef.

Ab. Canada  |  November, 07, 2013 at 01:26 PM

If US beef was competitive on the world market, you would think they wouldn't need protectionist measures to limit competition from Canadian beef.

Craig A. Moore    
Billings, MT  |  November, 07, 2013 at 02:08 PM

Where did almost all the cattle with BSE come from that caused all the problems for the US selling beef world-wide?

Craig A. Moore    
Billings, MT  |  November, 07, 2013 at 02:21 PM

The decision to restrict purchasing of Canadian cattle is solely a business decision by Tyson to make their lives easier. Let Canada sue them, the ones that made that decision, and then let them sue Mexico for all the extra, and cheaper, beef they have been dumping in the US because they can't support them because of the drought there, which reduced what the US bought from Canada. And then let them sue all the financial institutions that caused the market collapse that reduced peoples ability to purchase as much beef.

Kansas  |  November, 21, 2013 at 07:38 AM

To everyone it is rather simple:"Do you want to work for the USA cattle/beef industry from even further decline or micro manage some foreign country who is a importer of a competing product"? To those who argue for the WTO ruling remember they have no standing other than opportunity to challenge our USA Law. The Government passed in 1994 while working on the UTA, language an important paragraph that reads in laymens terms that "No foriegn law shall override any USA passed law". What part of that do others not understand. Tell those who complain to take a hike and the WTO biased panel needs to be challenged if anyone has fully looked into who served in that capacity. In the USA you would have o withdraw or sustain from being a direct conflict of interest if you sat on a board like that one. Most haven't "wanted to" study it and I guess some can't read!

XUV 855 Power Steering

Combining power steering with diesel power, durability and toughness, the 30 MPH, 22.8 HP John Deere Gator XUV855D features updates that enhance ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight