Economic effects of BRD on feedlot cattle during backgrounding and finishing
- Harvest options for forages
- Has the economy impacted restaurant consumers?
- Corn planting wraps up
- Monthly Cattle on Feed: Comments and implications
- Dry, hot weather concerns drive up corn futures on Monday
- Financial tool used climate change uncertainty to select land
- North Dakota cattleman loses 14 cattle to vandals
- Commentary: Farmers ‘pay it forward’ with pizza
- Cattle market analysis: Effects of the cattle on feed report
- Recap of 10 most endangered U.S. rivers
- Packer-feedyard standoff continues, light trade at $123
- Guest commentary: Slimed by pink slime
- Group claims breakthrough with discovery of new steak cut
- NCBA Op-Ed: Ranchers’ rights are being trampled
- Cattle market analysis: Effects of the cattle on feed report
- Cattle feeders running out of magic tricks
- Commentary: Bittman thinks global warming is “What’s For Dinner”
- Calving calculations
- Factors make farm bill debate more contentious than past years
- Cow calf corner: The pros and cons of growth-promoting implants
- Commentary: Searching for beef’s next toe-stubber
- Commentary: Why The New York Times' essay contest is phony
- Commentary: Vegan sweet dreams
- BSE found in central California, USDA confirms
- Slime time at AMI: expo panel on rehabbing LFTB
- Commentary: Bittman thinks global warming is “What’s For Dinner”
- Vigilante cattlemen arrested for beating alleged rustler
- Veterinarian responds to New York Times essay
- Guest commentary: Slimed by pink slime
- Commentary: Advise and dissent
Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is the most common disease among feedlot cattle in the United States. It accounts for approximately 75 percent of feedlot morbidity and 50 percent to 70 percent of all feedlot deaths (Edwards, 1996; Galyean, Perino, and Duff, 1999; Loneragan et al., 2001). The majority of deaths due to BRD occur shortly after arrival to the feedlot or within the first 45 days (Edwards, 1996; Loneragan et al., 2001). In fact, Buhman et al. (2000) reported that about 91 percent of calves diagnosed with BRD were diagnosed within the first 27 days after arrival. BRD causes an estimated $800 million to $900 million annually in economic losses from death, reduced feed efficiency, and treatment costs (Chirase and Greene, 2001).
Medical costs attributable to the treatment of BRD are substantial, and the economic impacts of BRD on carcass merit and meat quality further increase the economic costs. Medicine costs accounted for 21 percent of the decrease, while 79 percent was attributable to lower carcass weight (8.4 percent less) and lower quality grade (24.7 percent more USDA Standard quality grade carcasses). BRD can also cause economic losses due to decreased gain and carcass values (Duff and Galyean, 2007). A Texas Ranch-to-Rail study found BRD morbidity accounted for 8 percent higher production costs, not including losses related to decreased performance (Griffin, Perino, and Wittum, 1995). They found cattle with BRD had a 3 percent decrease in gain compared with healthy cattle and cost the program $111.38 per sick animal. Snowder et al. (2006) estimated economic losses in a 1,000-head feedlot from BRD infection due to lower gains and treatment costs to be approximately $13.90 per animal.
Demand for higher quality products and increased value-based marketing have heightened beef producers’ awareness of health management practices with potential to increase profitability and beef product quality. Feedlot producers able to purchase calves more likely to remain healthy during the feeding period could potentially increase profits through reduced costs and higher revenues. Previous studies document the economic impact from BRD in either backgrounding or finishing programs. The majority of those studies are from animal scientists and veterinarians. Current research relating to animal disease in agricultural economics journals deals with major outbreaks of infectious diseases (e.g. bovine spongiform encephalopathy or bovine brucellosis), tracking systems, and eradication programs (Amosson et al., 1981; Elbakidze, 2007; Hennessy, Rossen, and Jensen, 2005; Kuchler and Hamm, 2000). Limited research on BRD in feedlot cattle is reported in agricultural economic journals. Nyamusika et al. (1994) however, using a stochastic simulation model of BRD, found significant returns to vaccination of cattle. The simulation found vaccination programs, combined with treatment of BRD, increase net revenues by $44. Further analysis on the economic effects of BRD in the backgrounding phase is warranted along with the effects in the finishing phase and the phases combined.
Knowing the economic impact of BRD on both backgrounding and finishing phases is important. A tool enabling producers to determine whether animals will remain healthy could potentially increase producers’ profits. Serum haptoglobin (Hp) concentration has been suggested as a tool for making management decisions based on data that shows cattle requiring treatment for BRD had a higher Hp concentration upon arrival than calves that remained healthy throughout the preconditioning phase (Berry et al., 2005; Step et al., 2008). Hp is an acute-phase protein produced by the liver in response to cellular injury. Based upon Hp concentration upon arrival producers could potentially determine animals that would remain healthy.
The overall objective of this research was to determine the economic effects of BRD on backgrounding and finishing phases individually, as well as the two phases combined for the same cattle. In addition, this research measures the effectiveness of using serum Hp concentration to predict BRD occurrence and the impact of multiple treatments for BRD in backgrounding on both backgrounding and cattle feeding performance.
Click here for the full research report.





Comments (0)
Leave a comment