Pregnancy examination - Is it worth the cost?
- MF Global paid Corzine $8 million in year before collapse
- Drought recedes, but conditions still dicey in some regions
- Cattle management: Relocating beef cows in drought conditions
- CCA on hand for milestone Steaks for Soldiers event
- Cattle futures pushed by improved beef cutout prices
- Dealing with a common disease in cattle- pinkeye
- Monday Market Sentiment: Cash cattle to drop with short week
- Prices for cull cows poised to set another record
- Registration open for 2012 Cattle Industry Summer Conference
- Behavior of feedlot cattle is related to carcass quality
- Packer-feedyard standoff continues, light trade at $123
- Group claims breakthrough with discovery of new steak cut
- Guest commentary: Slimed by pink slime
- North Dakota cattleman loses 14 cattle to vandals
- Merck Animal Health introduces ZUPREVO a new antibiotic for BRD
- NCBA Op-Ed: Ranchers’ rights are being trampled
- Cattle market analysis: Effects of the cattle on feed report
- Calving calculations
- Cattle feeders running out of magic tricks
- Commentary: Bittman thinks global warming is “What’s For Dinner”
- Commentary: Searching for beef’s next toe-stubber
- Commentary: Why The New York Times' essay contest is phony
- Commentary: Vegan sweet dreams
- BSE found in central California, USDA confirms
- Slime time at AMI: expo panel on rehabbing LFTB
- Guest commentary: Slimed by pink slime
- Commentary: Bittman thinks global warming is “What’s For Dinner”
- Veterinarian responds to New York Times essay
- Vigilante cattlemen arrested for beating alleged rustler
- Commentary: Advise and dissent
With the arrival of spring, thoughts of working cattle begin to stir in most beef cattle producers’ minds. However, with the amount of time it takes to round up the herd and the aggravations associated with herd work, these are not often pleasant thoughts. The last thing a producer wants to do is add time and cost to an already difficult, expensive, and exhausting day or days of work. In this light, it is easy to see why one important management practice frequently overlooked or neglected by many beef producers is pregnancy examination. According to the 1997 National Animal Health Management Survey (“NAHMS”), only one fifth of cow/calf producers have their cows checked for pregnancy although the benefits easily outweigh the cost.
The most obvious benefit of knowing which cows are open is cost savings. A pregnancy examination will typically average $5 per head but carrying an open cow over the winter may cost several hundred dollars in hay alone (not to mention mineral, supplemental feed, vaccines, and dewormers that add additional carrying costs). Knowing who to sell allows one to make good marketing decisions such as:
1. Weaning calves early and selling culls when the cull market is high
2. Selling open heifers when they are younger and still fit the feeder market
3. Sorting off and feeding thin cows to bring a higher price and sell more pounds
Beyond the marketing aspects, pregnancy checking can be a tremendous decision making tool. Cows can be grouped into early or late season calvers and fed accordingly. Scours vaccine can also be administered at the right time to optimize colostral antibodies for the calf. Pregnancy exams are also important for the measurement of herd health and reproductive status. More open cows than expected (more than 5% open at pregnancy check) may indicate an abortion problem caused by an infectious organism such as the IBR or BVD viruses. It could also be an indicator of a sexually transmissible disease such as vibriosis or trichomoniasis. Nutritional deficiencies including a lack of energy, trace minerals, and/or protein may delay estrus and conception due to poor egg development and subsequent ovulation, resulting in open cows. Occasionally damage to the reproductive tract due to a difficult birth may result in a cow that will not breed back. Infertile bulls may be discovered at pregnancy checking time although hopefully too many cows regularly returning to heat would be noticed prior to the end of breeding season. However, in a herd observed infrequently or in a far off pasture, bull problems can easily be missed. Animals that are detected open early can then be immediately returned to aggressive breeding programs using other reproductive technologies.
Pregnancy examinations can be accomplished by several different methods including rectal palpation, ultrasound or a blood test. Rectal palpation performed by an experienced veterinarian can estimate the approximate stage of pregnancy and can be detected 35-40 days after breeding. Veterinarians use the art of palpation of fetal membranes, position of the uterus, size of the cotyledons and size/strength of pulse in the uterine arteries to determine pregnancy status and length of gestation. Disadvantages to palpation are few and often exaggerated. Rough handling of the fetus or membranes early in gestation has been associated with abortion but it is difficult to differentiate these from the “normal” amount of expected embryonic loss. Another concern is blood borne diseases such as anaplasmosis and bovine leukemia virus that can be transmitted cow-to-cow by blood present on an examination sleeve used in multiple cows. Bovine practitioners are very aware of this danger and change sleeves when blood is present or some doctors use a new sleeve on each cow.
Ultrasound can detect pregnancy earlier than palpation (around day 27 in the hands of a skilled operator) but is more expensive-largely due to the cost of the equipment. It can provide more detailed information such as viability of the fetus, presence of twins and sex of the calf and it is considered extremely accurate. Both ultrasound and palpation provide immediate answers so cows can be sorted from the chute without handling multiple times.
A blood test (“BioPRYN”) is commercially available that detects a protein produced by the placenta which is detectable in serum. Heifers and cows can be tested at 30 days or later after breeding but a cow must be at least 90 days post calving due to residual protein from the previous pregnancy. The blood must be drawn and sent to a participating laboratory for results so cows would need to be sorted at a later date after results were reported. BioPRYN is advertised as 99 percent accurate when it identifies open cows at least 30 days post breeding with less than 1 percent showing false-open (false-negative). Correct open detection is very important because giving prostaglandin to a pregnant cow will often cause abortion. The falsepregnant (false-positive) rate for the test is approximately 5 percent. There are many ways a producer can detect early pregnancies in his herd and multiple benefits available from this management tool. Producers are encouraged to work with their local veterinarian to schedule this valuable service. With so many potential benefits for one relatively small cost, it is one of the easiest economic decisions for a cow-calf producer to make.
Source: Dr. Michelle Arnold, Large Ruminant Extension Veterinarian, University of Kentucky





Comments (4)
Leave a commentJoe Itle
Report AbuseWith the passing of the Food Safety Act, the FDA enforcement of the Veterinary Patient Client Relationship is bound to be stepped up. Pregnancy diagnosis by a veterinarian would be a good time to satisfy the requirement.
Robert C Stout
Report AbuseDr. Arnold, I appreciate your article very much. I have been a private practitioner for 17 years doing only beef cattle work, 5 years ago I began doing soley E.T. work and feel that I have a lot of experience in this field. We currenlty run about 200 head of recips to calve out for clients. The more that I ultrasound catlle 35days and down, the more I feel there is a larger risk for early term abortion. I am very familiar with abortion rates etc btw 30 and 60 days, but my experience is ( esp bceause if I lose a pregnancy it cost my direct bottom line) that early term cows checked prior to 35 days will drop the pregnancy regardless if it was ultrasounded or blood tested. I personally feel that the stress of getting cows up and working them through (ultrasound or blood test) will increase the abortion rate due to stress. Not a good thing when a higher value calf is the target with ET. Sveral of my clients that I do not preg check for, that has other vets ultrasound or blood test for, report great 35 day preg rates on our ET work only to be surprised by open cycling cows 7 to 10 days after the preg check event. Just an FYI from the buckeye state that I currently advocate preg checking cows after 42 days, after this it sure does seem like preg rates remain the same until calving.
Any comments please let me know.. P.S. Ihope UK has a bad game friday.....Go Bucks
Thanks Rob Stout, DVM
C. Elwood Williams
Report AbuseGood article. We have 300 mother cows and we always pregnacy test cows and heifers. It is well worth the money spent regradless of which method you use.
A.GAJA
Report AbuseMany thanks for the writer of the article. I do not agree with Dr. Robert in his comment regarding to the risk of
abortion when handling pregnant cows, since many report saying that there were no different between pregnancy
rate in handled and non treated cows. and personally I have tried several experiment to diagnose pregnancy on
day 20 in cows, and no different found between pregnancy in treated cows with echo and non treated cows.
in the contrary I advise the owners of cows to do it as early as possible , since in my experiment I could reach to
diagnose cow at day 20 at + or - and then inseminate the non pregnant cow at day 21-24.