Tally Time: Beware of “creeping stocking rates”

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

The number of cow-calf pairs placed on a pasture is often determined based on previous experience and/or conventional wisdom. One of the factors that easily can be overlooked in establishing stocking rates is cow weight.

Range scientists typically use a 1,000 pound cow with calf as the base definition of one animal unit and cattlemen often use 1,200 pounds to describe the mature body weight of their cows. However, the average mature weight of cows in the U.S. has changed in the last 20 years. If we use feedlot exit weights as a base and the relationship between hot carcass weight and mature dam weight, the estimated mature weight of the 1990 U.S. cowherd was 1,228 pounds compared to 1,386 pounds in 2010 (Table 1). Therefore, using 1,200 pounds for a cow in 1990 was accurate, but today using a weight of 1,350 or 1,400 pounds would be more appropriate. If the total number of animals per unit of land, per month has not been adjusted, then the pounds of animal per unit of land may have increased by about 150 to 200 pounds per animal. This scenario can be referred to as “creeping stocking rate.” For example, a particular pasture supporting 200 cow-calf pairs in 1990, with the cows weighing about 1,200 pounds each, equals a total stocking number of 240,000 pounds. If the number of pairs turned out every spring has not been changed, the actual stocking number today would be 270,000 pounds, an increase of 12.5 percent! This could have serious implications on long-term forage quality and quantity. To get a comparable stocking rate today versus 1990, using 1,350 pound cows, only about 178 pairs should be placed on the pasture.

As many producers make plans for the upcoming grazing season, they should weigh a few cows and give this some thought. It may lead to some difficult decisions, but the long-term sustainability of the forage base may depend on it.

click image to zoom

Source: Justin Waggoner, beef systems specialist, Kansas State University

Comments (1) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Jim Sturrock    
NE CO  |  May, 22, 2011 at 01:54 PM

I fully agree with the larger cows of today. So the problem is how to adjust. Working under the hypthesis that a 5 month old calf consumes 2/3rds of the mother consumption. Therefore, an early weaning of the calf at 5 months is in fact a stocking adjustment. Opperating as a margin business, cost divided by sales, with feed cost by the combined calf and cull cows at 35 to 40% for feed cost. It is often stated that it is more cost effiecent to feed the calf verses feeding the cow who feeds the calf. Marketing plan calls for 475 wieght calves to go on wheat in the fall and in the spring to try and have 550's to go on grass by calving accordingly during the present cattle cycle.


The Krone BiG X features a MAN engine and a revolutionary crop flow design, VariStream. VariStream adapts the cross section ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight