Stacking technologies increases stocker profitability

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Implants and ionophores (i.e., Rumensin) are both proven technologies for stocker cattle production. However, some producers have asked what happens when these technologies are “stacked” together. Do these technologies retain their full efficacy when they are used simultaneously? Theoretically, the answer is “yes” because these technologies have different biological modes of action.

To demonstrate the effects of stacking these technologies, the Noble Foundation conducted an experiment in 2012. In this experiment, steers grazed cereal rye pasture at the Noble Foundation’s Red River Demonstration Farm for 84 days. Steers received one of three  supplementation programs: plain white salt blocks (SALT); non-medicated mineral blocks (MIN); or identical mineral blocks with added Rumensin (R-MIN). Further, half of the steers in each supplement treatment group were implanted (Component TE-G with Tylan) and the other  half were not implanted. These combinations allowed us to evaluate the effect of stacking the implant and ionophore technologies.

click image to zoom

As expected, the implant dramatically mproved average daily gain (ADG) (Figure 1). The R-MIN supplement also improved ADG compared to SALT. The non-medicated mineral block was intermediate in ADG. Importantly, we found no decrease in effectiveness of either the implant or the Rumensin when the two were used simultaneously. We calculated that stacking the two technologies significantly improved net return over the control system (no implant and salt supplementation).

click image to zoom

To determine block intake, we weighed the blocks in each paddock every week (Figure 2).  Apparent intake was least for salt blocks and greatest for the non-medicated mineral blocks. Overall, intake of the blocks was good, averaging about 3 ounces per steer per day. Adding Rumensin to the mineral blocks reduced intake of the block, which saved money and improved performance of the cattle. In this study, we followed the label feeding instructions which were to offer blocks at the rate of one block per five steers and to replace the blocks when 80 percent of the block disappeared.

Consider using both implants and ionophores to increase ADG of stocker cattle. Both management practices are profitable and work well together. If mineral blocks are more convenient than loose mineral, you can expect adequate intake if you follow the label directions.

Source: Ryan Reuter

Disclosure: This research was sponsored by Ridley Block Operations and Elanco Animal Health.



Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Cathy Bandyk    
Wisconsin  |  January, 11, 2013 at 03:03 PM

There is one other practical alternative for providing an ionophore in stocker grazing situations, and that is feeding Bovatec(R) in a free-choice liquid supplement. To be successful (and legal!), this would need to be added as the liquid form at the manufacturing facility, in an approved formula. Stocker operators considering the use of this management tool should compare all their options based on practicality, total costs (i.e., product plus delivery), and fit in their overall program.


HPX 4x4 Diesel

Not only is the Gator HPX 4x4 the fastest choice in the John Deere Work Utility Vehicle line-up (with a top ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight