The rapid rise in prices for feeder cattle and calves has been driven by shrinking supplies, a fact borne out by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s annual cattle inventory report. The national herd is now 90.8 million head, the lowest total since 1952. In shor t , demand is of f the charts from feedyards and stocker operators who need replacement cattle.
But with elevated prices comes elevated risk. Kansas State University agricultural economist Ted Schroeder says today’s risk significantly outweighs the risk feedyards saw just two years ago.
“In February 2010 we had June 2010 Live Cattle futures contracts at $88 per hundredweight,” Schroeder says. “Market volatility, based on live-cattle option prices at the time suggested we were 66 percent confident the fed-cattle cash price in June 2010 would be between $82 and $94.60 per hundredweight.” That implies traders were 66 percent confident fed-cattle values would range about $157 per head, from low to high, at the time 750-pound feeders were placed on feed.
Fast forward two years and we find June Live Cattle trading about $126 per hundredweight . “Today’s market volatility indicates we are 66 percent confident the price will be somewhere between $117.30 and $135.50 per hundredweight in June — a $227-per-head range from high to low for fed cattle,” Schroeder says. “That’s a 44 percent increase in revenue risk per head ($227 vs. $157) compared to two years ago.”
That risk is further compounded by the fact that corn prices are significantly higher than in 2010.
“Combining fed-cattle and corn price risk now with what it was just two years ago, my analysis suggests about a 44 percent increase in net return risk per head (the range from probably low to high return potential) for placing cattle early in February for harvest in June. And, with current feeder-cattle prices, we are starting with about a $60-perhead lower expected feeding return now compared to two years ago. Similar factors persist for elevated cow-calf producer and stocker operator risk.”
The risks for cow-calf and stocker operations, however, are tied more to production and cost management, rather than prices, according to Oklahoma State University agricultural economist Derrell Peel.