Advancing animal agriculture

 Resize text        

Following the National Institute for Animal Agriculture’s annual conference in Denver, Scott Stuart, the organization’s managing director, offers his observations from the program.

Animal agriculture faces a time of unprecedented opportunity in meeting the world’s growing demand for protein, while also navigating an array of challenges. The National Institute for Animal Agriculture’s annual conference focused on those issues, and Scott Stuart, NIAA’s managing director summarized some of the key points. NIAA is a broad-based organization with representation from across the industry and production of all livestock species.

Much of the discussion, Stuart says, centered around the need to address those challenges, including regulatory issues, a shrinking land base, higher production costs and a consumer base with limited understanding of agriculture and food production. Several speakers, he says, pointed out how tremendous advancements in efficiency and productivity have allowed animal agriculture, and food production overall, to keep pace with growing world populations.

That progress will need to accelerate in the coming years, though, even as resistance to agricultural technology grows among some consumers. During the conference closing general session, Brian Rittgers, Elanco’s director of global management development, Elanco, outlined how American agriculture can serve as a model for the world A century ago, he says, years ago, Americans spent, on average, 50 percent of their income on food, but today that percentage has dropped to just 10 percent.

By 2050, however, the world’s food production will need to double, and Rittgers says about 70 percent of the increase will need to come from improvements in technology to boost productivity. He pointed out, for example, that the Chinese government has set a goal of boosting dairy production enough to provide per-capita milk consumption of 300 grams per day, versus today’s average of 100 grams. To reach that goal, he says, China would need to add the equivalent of the total U.S. dairy herd four times over. Limitations on resources will prevent herd growth on that scale, so the increased production will need to come mostly from technology that increases output per cow.

Gary Sides, PhD, a nutritionist with Pfizer Animal Health, closed the conference discussing how improvements in agricultural productivity have freed the rest of our society for other pursuits, providing people with more choices on how to live their lives. 

“Because today U.S. agriculture takes just one person to feed 155, others can pursue careers outside of agriculture,” Sides says. In 1940, one person in U.S. agriculture could only feed 19 people. Thanks to technology, fewer people are needed today in agriculture.

“If technology was frozen in the year 1955, it would require an additional 450 million acres—the total land mass of Texas, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico and Oklahoma—to produce the beef we are producing today,” Sides points out. “Globally, if we still achieved yields of 1960, an additional 15-20 million square miles of farmland would be needed to produce today’s food supply.”

In 1961, the United States population was close to 184 million people. In 2006, that number was greater than 300 million people. Relating those numbers back to 1960, he explained, “If agriculture technology today was the same as 1960, we would either have to either expand acres by 63 percent or decrease food consumption by 63 percent.”

Presentations by NIAA’s Opening General Session and Closing General Session speakers as well as Miss America 2011 Teresa Scanlan and a majority of NIAA’s Council and Committee Meeting presentations are available online at NIAA’s website.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Sponsored Links


Comments (2) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Janet Weeks    
Sacramento, CA  |  April, 11, 2012 at 02:27 PM

Sorry to burst everyone's bubble, but animal agriculture is NOT the way to feed the growing population--at least not sustainably.

"Cattle consume 16 times as much grain as they produce as meat. Feed these grains to humans directly and we would not have hunger anywhere in the world -- plus much more forest land, energy reserves, water sources, and bio diversity, as much less grain production would be needed while feeding many more people."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB5H18Z8Fqo&feature=youtu.be

Maxine    
SD  |  April, 12, 2012 at 06:34 PM

Logic indicates there are flaws in the lady's premise. Time precludes research to verify that belief.

Most likely, she does not know the facts of modern beef production. Especially the fact that most cattle spend most of their lives eating grasses and forbes that humans would certainly not enjoy eating, and probably could not properly digest.

For instance, cattle on our ranch graze year round on native grasses, not planted ones, thus no farming is necessary for most of the diet. Cattle go to the feedlot at approximately 8 or 15 months of age, are fed from three to five months on harvested forages and some grains, before being processed fairly high quality beef, ususally by or before 20 months of age.

Further, there are more forested acres in the USA than there have ever been, due in no small part to the fact that we use oil for most of our energy needs!