EPA to host public meeting to discuss feedlot aerial surveillance

 Resize text        

Iowa and Nebraska cattle producers will have the opportunity to question the Environmental Protection Agency regarding its use of aerial surveillance in upcoming public meetings.

The aerial surveillance, which was questioned by Nebraska Congressmen and defended by the EPA, is used to monitor cattle feeding operations. The EPA uses aerial surveillance to take photos in search of environmental violations. If the photos reveal violations, the EPA responds with an on-ground inspection.

The EPA is confronting the resistance head-on with a public meeting with Nebraska producers next week and a second forum in Iowa in late August.

Producers see the aerial surveillance as an invasion of privacy and an unnecessary practice. Any explanation by the EPA has failed to silent complaints. The Omaha World Herald reports an amendment to the farm bill by Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., to ground the surveillance failed by just four votes. Similar amendments to the House version of the farm bill have received support.

Aerial surveillance has been used by the EPA since 2010. The surveillance resulted in 39 enforcement actions in Iowa and 14 in Nebraska.

The open meeting is scheduled in Lexinton, Neb. on Monday night from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. at the Holiday Inn Express and will include presentations by EPA staff members from the Region 7 office in Kansas City. The next meeting in Carroll, Iowa is planned for Aug. 30.


Sponsored Links


Comments (5) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Mary    
Kansas  |  June, 29, 2012 at 09:21 AM

You should correct this article by acknowledging that the EPA is not using "drones". The survellience is done by people in small planes rather than people in pick-up trucks or cars on the ground resulting in a cost savings for the same result. I expect a little better accuracy from you than to repeat something that isn't true but makes a splashy story.

michael    
kansas  |  June, 29, 2012 at 10:37 AM

A correction would be called for only if drones were mentioned in this report, and they weren't. I don't see your point, other than as furthering a distracting discussion of no value. The POINT is the likely violations of the 4th ammendment and the targeting (exposed "crucify"/"make an example of" EPA statements) EPA methods.
It would be interesting to ask the EPA who else they're using these questionable methods to monitor. Such as the 100s of municipalities violating the terms of their sewage treatment "by-pass" and "overflow" permits which discharge untreated and partially treated Human Sewage directly into streams and waterways.

Dr Dan    
Ohio  |  June, 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM

What ever happened to a warrant before a search, which took probable cause, before a judge?

Dr Dan    
Ohio  |  June, 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM

What ever happened to a warrant before a search, which took probable cause, before a judge?

maxine    
SD  |  June, 30, 2012 at 06:52 PM

We should not lose sight of the fact that farmsteads are our HOMES, not just our business places. How would the "Mary's' supporting this practice feel if a small airplane circled their back yards, checking for any possible infraction of zoning rules, misuse of herbicides and pesticides, or even of child abuse???

How much training and certification is required for homeowners before using chemicals on their lawns? And what are requirements for registration of their premises and what records are kept of amounts and types of such chemicals for home use? What is the total sales annually of such 'home use' chemicals? That number sure could surprise us! My guess is that it NOT regulated in any way.