Comparing welfare standards

 Resize text        

If you are confused over the selection of certification programs for animal-welfare practices, Humane Farm Animal Care (HFAC), the organization that administers the Certified Humane program, has developed a comparison tool for several of the best-known programs.

The comparison chart appears somewhat biased toward the Certified Humane program, but could serve as a useful reference tool for producers thinking about pursuing certification of their production practices.

The chart compares fie programs – HFAC/Certified Humane, Animal Welfare Approved, Global Animal Partnership (GAP), USDA Organic program and American Humane Certified – on 37 animal-welfare standards. Some of the standards apply to all livestock, while others apply specifically to cattle, swine or poultry.

The chart illustrates differences between these programs, which could be useful information for retailers or consumers in their product choices, and also for producers for evaluating programs for possible participation. The USDA Organic program for example, differs from the others on several points, which is not surprising since that program focuses primarily on inputs for “organic” production rather than on animal welfare specifically. Of the other programs listed, some have standards similar to those for organic production while others do not.

Each of the programs prohibits use of growth implants, but their policies on antibiotic use varies somewhat. They all limit antibiotic use to treatment of disease in individual animals, but GAP and USDA organic require that treated animals are removed from their programs and marketed through other channels. The other three programs allow treated animals to remain in the program, according to the chart.

The chart also shows differences in requirements for cattle access to pasture or forage:

  • HFAC/Certified Humane – Standards require beef cattle to have continuous access to outdoors to pasture or range. Can be feedyard finished.
  • Animal Welfare Approved – Standards require that all animals are pasture raised.
  • GAP (Step 1) – Can be raised on range, grass and can be feedlot finished.
  • USDA Organic – Requires that 30 percent of dry matter must come from pasture during the grazing season, which must be a minimum of 120 days out of the year.
  • American Humane Certified – No requirements for cattle to have outdoor access.

Regarding feedyard stocking density

  • HFAC/Certified Humane – Space for calves is 300 to 600 square feet per head, for adults it is 400 to 800 square feet per head depending on the size of the animal and slope of the ground.
  • Animal Welfare Approved – Cattle cannot be finished in feedyards
  • GAP (Step 1) – 250 square feet per head regardless of size or age.
  • USDA Organic – Not addressed
  • American Humane Certified – Calculated based on slope, size and age.

The chart also shows differences in entry and compliance requirements for the programs:

  • HFAC/Certified Humane – All producers must comply with all standards in order to be certified – 100 percent pass-fail standards must be met.
  • Animal Welfare Approved – All producers must comply with all standards in order to be certified – 100 percent pass-fail standards must be met.
  • GAP – This is a five-step program, with some standards applying to all steps and some to individual steps. Producers must meet standards for Step 1, higher steps are elective after the requirements for Step 1 are met.
  • USDA Organic – All producers must comply with all standards in order to be certified – 100 percent pass-fail standards must be met.
  • American Humane Certified – Farms are audited using the audit checklist on a percentage basis; 85 percent is required for passing score. Auditors score the forms and determine what corrective actions are required. Farms have 90 days to submit verification of corrective actions.

View the chart from HFAC/Certified Humane.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Sponsored Links


Comments (4) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Adele Douglass    
Herndon, VA  |  August, 15, 2012 at 03:20 PM

The chart reflects the actual standards and the programs. The sections for each standard are cited so there is no "interpretation." Presumably, your comment that the chart is biased towards Certified Humane is because we are the best program, other than AWA which is a grass fed/pasture only program. Thanks so much for the review!

Adele Douglass    
Herndon, VA  |  August, 15, 2012 at 03:20 PM

The chart reflects the actual standards and the programs. The sections for each standard are cited so there is no "interpretation." Presumably, your comment that the chart is biased towards Certified Humane is because we are the best program, other than AWA which is a grass fed/pasture only program. Thanks so much for the review!

Kathi Brock    
Washington DC  |  August, 16, 2012 at 05:00 PM

Thank you for your article. Charts such as the one you have linked to can be helpful tools for busy farmers and ranchers. However, we agree with you that the “comparison chart appears somewhat biased toward the Certified Humane program.” Rather than relying on interpretations we encourage your readers to visit the websites of each of the respective organizations cited here in order to see what each organization actually says, rather than seeing a characterization, and form their own unbiased opinions. The website for the American Humane Certified program has information regarding all aspects of our program, including our Animal Welfare Standards, links to our Scientific Advisory Committee, and our history. Here you will find that the American Humane Certified program was the first and original third party welfare audit in the US. Today we are the largest welfare certified program and the fastest growing with over 135 million animals under our label. Visit us at www.HumaneHeartland.org. The website for the organization behind our label is at www.AmericanHumane.org . Feel free to contact us– we will be happy to fully answer your questions about our program.

Peggy    
Central Massachusetts  |  August, 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM

Largest and fastest growing humane organization -- it would have meant more to hear you substantiate the practices of the american humane certified program as meeting the conscience-guided improvements that show standards leadership. Things are not good now. If there is no requirement for outdoor access for cattle--what are you doing about it. Live processing--what are you doing to change that. But most of all what are ALL the organizations doing to help the best farmers get promoted at the storefront where walk in consumers have a chance to learn. Simple posters in windows and again at the meat counter. People will choose humane products if they are forced to see what really goes on. Cattle production alone involves 96 million animals per year according to USDA. The pigs--it is really awful to see what they endure.