Cattle feeding margins: meager improvement; packers in the red

 Resize text        

A meager $1 per hundredweight advance in cash fed cattle prices last week produced a slight  improvement in cattle feeding margins. Still, feedyards are losing in excess of $250 on every animal they send to market. Packer margins also slipped into the red last week as boxed beef prices declined. Packer margins slipped nearly $20 per head, according to the Sterling Beef Profit Tracker. The Sterling Beef Profit Quotient gained 45 points for the week, but the industry profitability index remains a negative 768, according to estimates developed by Sterling Marketing, Inc., Vale, Ore.

Pork producer margins gained more than $4 per head last week with profits exceeding $26 per hog marketed. Negotiated cash hog prices increased $1.02 per hundredweight last week. Pork packer margins improved nearly $2 per head for the week, but margins remain in the red at more than $8 per head, according to the Sterling Pork Profit Tracker.

A year ago cattle feeders sold cash cattle at $108.29 per hundredweight, resulting in losses of $128.41 per head. Last year cash hogs fetched $101.35 per hundredweight, resulting in profits of $37.46 per head.

The Sterling Beef and Pork Profit Trackers are calculated using actual weekly prices for both cattle and hogs, feed costs, beef and pork cutout prices, drop credits and other factors that influence profit margins.

The Sterling Beef Profit Tracker for the week ending July 28:

  • Average feedyard margins: -$253.64 per head.
  • Average packer margins: -$12.99 per head.
  • Sterling Profit Quotient: -768.2.

The Sterling Pork Profit Tracker for the week ending July 28:

  • Average farrow-to-finish margins:  $26.69 per head.
  • Average pork packer margins: -$8.48 per head.

The Sterling Beef and Pork Profit Trackers are produced by Sterling Marketing Inc. and John Nalivka, president, Vale, Ore., and are published weekly by Drovers/CattleNetwork.



Comments (2) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

c andrews    
chicago-kansas  |  July, 31, 2012 at 01:50 PM

Sorry to say the wreck is far from turning. Never has the "cowboys" gone so beseck pretending prices would be static for feed and consumers would pay out of orbit prices for meat. Regarding carboydrates/grain, remember it is not about feeding 600M people in North and South America but 6.5B on the other side of the planet.

Gary Burkholder    
Abilene, Kansas  |  July, 31, 2012 at 04:07 PM

It's not your responsibility to feed the "other" 6.5 Billion, Never was, never will be. Of that number, there are numerous billions that will never even be able to afford to eat beef. Count yourself lucky that the Beef Export Market has benefited you to have some Profits and enabled you to buy some things you've wanted and needed for a long time.

I've worked hard to help that be achieved. But we can't afford beef at our house right now. We'd buy beef, if we could. We've had to adjust to our situation, and meat on a cost/portion basis is what we've had to resort to doing. Our diet has changed by virtue of current costs of all we eat. (We haven't been to a restaurant all this year.


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight