Trust in food

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Consumers are confused about food and food production, and many do not know whom to trust for food information. But the good news is, many trust farmers and ranchers more than other information sources, and first-hand exposure to production agriculture tends to improve consumers’ perceptions of food production. Those are some of the findings of a study from advertising and marketing agency Sullivan, Higdon & Sink.

Their report, titled “Building trust in what we eat,” outlines what U.S. consumers know or think they know about food production, what they want to know and which information sources they trust.

In this survey, only 40 percent of consumers rated their food-production knowledge as good or excellent, while 60 percent indicated they have poor, fair or average knowledge of the subject. Higher percentages of consumers claim good or excellent knowledge of movies, politics, history or music. Most want to know more though, as 69 percent of consumers overall and 77 percent of moms said it is important to learn about food production.

As for transparency, only 19 percent of respondents believe food companies are transparent about how food is produced, while 22 percent believe the agricultural community is transparent. In both cases, consumers who rate their food knowledge as good or excellent were somewhat more likely to believe food companies and agriculture are sufficiently transparent, suggesting consumer education can help build trust.

Farm visits had some positive impact on consumers’ perceptions of food. Nineteen percent of all consumers and 22 percent of moms who had visited a farm said it made them feel better about food. For a majority, farm visit had no influence, and for 6 percent of all consumers and 11 percent of moms, visiting a farm actually made them feel worse about food. More recent visits had more positive impact, as 26 percent of consumers who visited a farm in the past year felt better about food compared with just 10 percent whose last farm visit was 10 to 20 years ago.

As for meat and packaging information, 60 percent want to know whether the animal was given hormones, 42 percent want to know what medicines the animal was given in its lifetime and 34 percent want to know where the animal was raised and what its living conditions were like.

The largest percentage of consumers, 66 percent, consider friends and family trustworthy for food information, followed by USDA and FDA at 59 and 57 percent respectively,

Fifty three percent of consumers consider farmers and ranchers trustworthy sources of food information, compared with just 17 percent for food manufacturers.

The authors suggest food marketers could benefit by involving farmers and ranchers in telling their stories directly to consumers and by informing consumers of the involvement of USDA and FDA in ensuring food safety.

The full report is available for download from Sullivan, Higdon & Sink.

Comments (3) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

wny  |  April, 09, 2013 at 08:44 AM

I don't think consumers are the only ones in the dark. I understand that farm market owners are being asked to sign agreements with the FDA that prohibits any production of food that may be eaten raw to be exposed to any animals. Do the regulators at FDA know that the only way that is remotely possible is by growing all such crops under cover. Believe me it sure would be nice to keep deer, rabbits, woodchucks and birds totally at bay in growing fields, but to do so would require massive eradication of those species and more. FDA should be in charge of food after it is harvested. USDA should be in charge of food while it is grown. That is not to say that all USDA employees that work inside the Beltway, are fully knowledgeable about how food actually gets grown.

shaun evertson    
Nebraska  |  April, 11, 2013 at 08:30 AM

Good points, Sue. I'm in no way comfortable, however, with having career bureaucrats and political appointees in charge of food. We could at one time trust the FDA and USDA to be honest and objective, but that began to fade out in the 1980's. In today's regulatory agencies, political pandering and job security are the driving forces. They've given us meatless Mondays at USDA and ideologically based regulations on antibiotics in food animals, fertilizer and pesticide use, etc. Not a single regulation based in any way on objective science or even in reality. Farmers and ranchers can feed the planet, bureaucrats and politicians can only cause famine and starvation.

Texas  |  May, 25, 2013 at 07:39 AM

GMO corn seems to be adversely affecting my animals. Preemies, infertility, general condition is dropping as years go by. I started noticing this 4 years ago. 80% of corn is GMO now. I can't find natural corn to feed them. I'm worried too not just as a producer but a consumer. GHW Bush, who ordered that no studies needed to be done on GMO before it's release???, the terrible truth is we may already be doomed. This researcher has uncovered a pathogen that effects both plants and animals. Meanwhile our legislators are pushing through every pro Monsanto bill they can get their hands on.Thanks to Monsanto march today at the Alamo. Maybe this will get people off the couch and turn them into activists. I knew something was wrong from my goats miscarrying and preemies the last few years. Just not thriving as in years before. No wonder so many people are getting cancer too. God help us. The law just confiscated some bee hives from a scientist in Illinois doing a study on GM/round up ready problems in bees (without a warrant) and ruined 15 years of research....they say they lost the hives now? Little doubt they were destroyed. That sure seems desperate & illegal. Monsanto has been playing God, it's time for them to stop!

Bobcat 3650

The Bobcat 3650 utility vehicle offers heat and air conditioning, a hydrostatic drive and the capacity to operate front-mounted PTO ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight