Profit Suckers: Parasites in Cattle

BT_Dewormer_Cattle_Chute
BT_Dewormer_Cattle_Chute

By: Laura Mushrush

From the March issue of Drovers.

While there hasn’t been any recent academic institution research on the economic impact of parasites in cattle, a 2007 study, “Economic Analysis of Pharmaceutical Technologies in Modern Beef Production,” by researchers at Iowa State University, found deworming to be one of the most beneficial technologies available to beef producers. The research breaks down the impact parasite infestations can have on different cattle segments:

Cow–calf: Dewormers carry the highest impact on weaning rate, at 23.6%. When dewormers were eliminated from the test groups, the expected impact was 34.3%, or an added cost of $165.47 per head.

Stocker: The only consistently reported change in production efficiency for stocker operations was average daily gain. Dewormers had the greatest impact, with their elimination accounting for an additional $20.77 per head in breakeven prices, up 2.7%. When the five technologies tested (ionophores, subtherapeutic antibiotics, growth-promotant implants, dewormer and fly control) were eliminated , the effect on the breakeven price was an additional $80.79 per head. When all but the dewormer and fly control were eliminated, the impact added $43.25 per head, which meant parasite control alone accounted for almost half of the difference in the cattle’s performance.

Feedlot: Dewormers improved average daily gain by 5.6% and decreased the feed-to-gain ratio by 3.9%. It was the second largest costsaving technology, behind growth-promotant implants. When all five technologies were eliminated, there was reduction in the breakeven price by 12%, which was set at a cost of $126.09 per head. When all technologies but dewormer were eliminated, the effect was 9.6%, or a cost of $101.03 per head.

 

Latest News

Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High
Markets: Cash Cattle Rebound, Futures Notch Four-Week High

After a mostly sluggish April, market-ready fed cattle saw a solid rally in the North and steady money in the South. Futures markets began to look past the psychologically bearish H5N1 virus news.

APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison
APHIS To Require Electronic Animal ID for Certain Cattle and Bison

APHIS issued its final rule on animal ID that has been in place since 2013, switching from solely visual tags to tags that are both electronically and visually readable for certain classes of cattle moving interstate.

How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?
How Do Wind, Solar, Renewable Energy Effect Land Values?

“If we step back and look at what that means for farmland, we're taking our energy production system from highly centralized production facilities and we have to distribute it,” says David Muth.

Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado
Ranchers Concerned Over Six Confirmed Wolf Kills in Colorado

Six wolf depredations of cattle have been confirmed in Colorado from reintroduced wolves.

Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid
Profit Tracker: Packer Losses Mount; Pork Margins Solid

Cattle and hog feeders find dramatically lower feed costs compared to last year with higher live anumal sales prices. Beef packers continue to struggle with negative margins.

Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation
Applying the Soil Health Principles to Fit Your Operation

What’s your context? One of the 6 soil health principles we discuss in this week’s episode is knowing your context. What’s yours? What is your goal? What’s the reason you run cattle?